Chinese Physics C > 1997, Vol. 21 > Issue(S1): 455-456

Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”

Zhao Yumin¹,
Chen Jinquan²

1 Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing, China;
2 Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
This comment points that the proof of the so-called "irreducibility postulation" is incorrect. The mistake lies in the fact that the symmetrization operator therein has no physical correspondence, and as a consequence, it provides nothing new or interesting in the concept of physics.
- irreducibility,
- non-accidental degeneracy,
- accidental degeneracy

[1]	Abdusalam Abdukerim,Wei Chen,Xun Chen,Yunhua Chen,Chen Cheng,Xiangyi Cui,Yingjie Fan,Deqing Fang,Changbo Fu,Mengting Fu,Lisheng Geng,Karl Giboni,Linhui Gu,Xuyuan Guo,Ke Han,Changda He,Di Huang,Yan Huang,Yanlin Huang,Zhou Huang,Xiangdong Ji,Yonglin Ju,Shuaijie Li,Huaxuan Liu,Jianglai Liu,Wenbo Ma,Yugang Ma,Yajun Mao,Yue Meng,Kaixiang Ni,Jinhua Ning,Xuyang Ning,Xiangxiang Ren,Changsong Shang,Lin Si,Guofang Shen,Andi Tan,Anqing Wang,Hongwei Wang,Meng Wang,Qiuhong Wang,Siguang Wang,Wei Wang,Xiuli Wang,Zhou Wang,Mengmeng Wu,Shiyong Wu,Weihao Wu,Jingkai Xia,Mengjiao Xiao,Pengwei Xie,Binbin Yan,Jijun Yang,Yong Yang,Chunxu Yu,Jumin Yuan,Ying Yuan,Xinning Zeng,Dan Zhang,Tao Zhang,Li Zhao,Qibin Zheng,Jifang Zhou,Ning Zhou,Xiaopeng Zhou,(PandaX-II Collaboration). Study of background from accidental coincidence signalsin the PandaX-II experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(10): 103001.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac7cd8
[2]	M.V. Smirnov,Zhoujun Hu,Shuaijie Li,Jiajie Ling. Potential of octant degeneracy resolution in JUNO. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(3): 033001.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/43/3/033001
[3]	YU Jing-Yi,WANG Zhe,CHEN Shao-Min. A precise calculation of delayed coincidence selection efficiency and accidental coincidence rate. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(5): 056201.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/5/056201
[4]	ZHANG Zhen-Hua,LÜ Gang,WEI Ke-Wei. Probing the mass degeneracy of particles with different spins. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(5): 053101.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/5/053101
[5]	ZOU Peng-Cheng. Reply to 《Comment on “The Proof of Irreducibility Postulation and Its Applications”》. Chinese Physics C, 2001, 25(9): 937-939.
[6]	Zou Pengcheng,Huang Yongchang. Proof of “Irreducible Postulation” and Its Applications. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S4): 375-378.

Access

Get Citation

Zhao Yumin and Chen Jinquan. Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”[J]. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(S1): 455-456.

Zhao Yumin and Chen Jinquan. Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”[J]. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(S1): 455-456. shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 1996-01-12

Article Metric

Article Views(1551)
PDF Downloads(6)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Comment on “Proof of ‘Irreducibility Postulation’ and Its Applications”

Zhao Yumin^1,
Chen Jinquan^2,

1 Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing, China;
2 Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Received Date:1996-01-12

Abstract:This comment points that the proof of the so-called "irreducibility postulation" is incorrect. The mistake lies in the fact that the symmetrization operator therein has no physical correspondence, and as a consequence, it provides nothing new or interesting in the concept of physics.