-
Neutrinos in the standard model (SM) are strictly massless owing to the absence of right-handed chiral states and the requirement of
$S U(2)_L$ gauge invariance and renormalizability. However, neutrino oscillation experiments show that neutrinos have minor non-zero masses, which insinuates the existence of new physics (NP) beyond the SM. To explain the tiny neutrino mass, we must extend the SM, and the mechanism with respect to neutrino mass generation is attracting increasing attention. An interesting mechanism to generate the neutrino mass which introduces heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos ($ \overline{N^c_R} $ ) is known as the type-I seesaw mechanism [1–5]. In this mechanism, the Dirac neutrino mass terms are generated after spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. In addition, the Majorana neutrinos can also form Majorana mass terms,$ \overline{N^c_R}M_RN_R $ . The introduction of heavy Majorana neutrinos may lead toCPviolation, which gives a reasonable explanation for the asymmetry of matter and antimatter. The asymmetry of baryon number in our Universe can be measured by the baryon-to-photon density ratio$ \eta=n_B/n_\gamma $ . According to an analysis of a recent Planck measurement of the cosmic microwave background, the value ofηis approximately$ \eta\simeq (6.12\pm 0.03)\times10^{-10} $ [6]. This result is too large compared to the result expected by the SM. In a famous mechanism called leptogenesis, this asymmetry of baryon number can be produced by the lepton number asymmetry caused by the decay of Majorana neutrinos in the early Universe; the latter may turn into baryon number asymmetry through sphaleron processes [7,8] in this situation. The existence of heavy Majorana neutrinos also leads to the violation of lepton number by two units,$ \Delta L=2 $ , such as the neutrinoless double-beta decay$ (0\nu\beta\beta) $ [9,10]. In our study, we consider rareWdecay through Majorana neutrino exchange, which produces a same-sign dilepton in the final state. Generally, both light and heavy Majorana neutrinos can contribute to theWdecay amplitude. However, the contribution of light Majorana neutrinos is strongly suppressed and can be safely neglected owing to the small mass, such as$ \mathcal{O}(eV) $ . The process of the rareWdecay$ W^-\rightarrow \ell_1^-N\rightarrow \ell_1^-\ell_2^-(q\bar{q}^\prime)^+ $ has been studied in literature (for examples of a review, see Refs. [11–15]). In the mass range$ M_N , the$ \Delta L=2 $ same-sign dilepton production signal has been studied in rare meson decays [16–20], tau lepton decays [21–23], and even top quark decays [24–27]. There is a nonzeroCPasymmetry induced by the difference between the rates of$ W^+\rightarrow \ell_1^+\ell_2^+(\bar{q}q^\prime)^- $ and itsCP-conjugate process$ W^-\rightarrow \ell_1^-\ell_2^-(q\bar{q}^\prime)^+ $ . This difference arises from the significant interference of different heavy Majorana neutrinos. We can use the lepton number violation (LNV) process as a probe to study heavy Majorana neutrinos. Theorists have conducted numerous studies on the prospect of observingCPasymmetry via LNV processes in whichCPasymmetry can be observed in the decays of mesons [28–32] and tau leptons [33,34]. Recently, the authors of Refs. [35,36] studiedCPasymmetry in rareWdecays at the LHC; however, theCPviolation effect produced in the situation they considered is influenced by the initial parton distribution functions in protons. In this study, we investigate the prospect of searching for heavy Majorana neutrinos in future lepton colliders such as the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) [37], International Linear Collider (ILC) [38], and Muon Collider (MuC) [39], which provide a significantly cleaner environment. We analyze the process of$ W^\pm $ pair production in$ e^+e^- $ collisons with the ILC running at 190 GeV and the$ \mu^+\mu^- $ collison with the MuC running at 190 GeV, where$ W^+ $ and$ W^- $ arise from$ e^+e^- $ and$ \mu^+\mu^- $ collisions, and the influence of the parton distribution functions in protons onCPviolation can be canceled. In principle, the numbernof right-handed heavy Majorana neutrinos introduced in the type-I seesaw mechanism is a free parameter. We take$ n\geq 2 $ as two neutrino mass-squared differences between observed light neutrinos. Another reason is thatCPviolation requires the interference of at least two different Majorana neutrinos. For convenience, we take only two heavy Majorana neutrinos,$ N_1 $ and$ N_2 $ , into consideration, and the general case with more Majorana neutrinos can be analyzed in a similar way.This paper is organized as follows. The model including heavy Majorana neutrinos is briefly reviewed in Section II. Then, we investigateWpair production and their rare decays via Majorana neutrinos at future lepton colliders in Section III. Finally, a short summary is given in Section IV.
-
An effective extension of the SM introduces three right-handed neutrinos, which are singlets under the SM gauge group.CPviolation stems from different Majorana neutrinos, and for convenience, we only consider two generations of Majorana heavy neutrinos, denoted as
$ N_1 $ and$ N_2 $ . We can write the Lagrangian of the model as [40]$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{\rm SM}+\mathcal{L}_{N}+\mathcal{L}_{WN\ell}+\mathcal{L}_{ZN\nu}+\mathcal{L}_{HN\nu}, \end{array} $
(1) where
$ \mathcal{L}_N $ is the sum of the kinetic and mass terms for heavy neutrinos,$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \mathcal{L}_N=\xi_\nu \left(\bar{N_k} {\rm i} \not \partial N_k-m_{N_k}\bar{N_k}N_k\right), \end{array} $
(2) where
$ k=1,2 $ , and the overall factor$ \xi_\nu=1 $ for the Dirac neutrinos and$ \xi_\nu=\dfrac{1}{2} $ for Majorana neutrinos. In our case,$ \xi_\nu=\dfrac{1}{2} $ .$ \mathcal{L}_{WN\ell} $ corresponds to heavy neutrino interactions with aWboson,$ \mathcal{L}_{WNl}=-\frac{g}{\sqrt{2}}W_\mu^+\sum\limits_{k=1}^{2}\sum\limits_{l=e}^{\tau}\bar{N_k}R_{l k}^\ast\gamma^\mu P_L\ell^- + {\rm h.c.}, $
(3) $ \mathcal{L}_{ZN\nu} $ corresponds to interactions with aZboson,$ \mathcal{L}_{ZN\nu}=-\frac{g}{2\text{cos}\theta_{W}}Z_{\mu}\sum\limits_{k=1}^{2}\sum\limits_{l=e}^{\tau}\bar{N_k}R_{lk}^\ast\gamma^{\mu}P_L\nu_{l} + {\rm h.c.}, $
(4) and
$ \mathcal{L}_{HN\nu} $ corresponds to interactions with a Higgs boson,$ \mathcal{L}_{HN\nu}=-\frac{gm_N}{2M_W}h\sum\limits_{k=1}^{2}\sum\limits_{l=e}^{\tau}\bar{N_k}R_{lk}^\ast P_L\nu_l + {\rm h.c.}. $
(5) In our process, we only use
$ \mathcal{L}_{WNl} $ . We can then write the weak charged-current interaction Lagrangian as$ \begin{aligned}[b] \mathcal{L}_{\rm cc} =& -\frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} W^+_{\mu} \sum\limits_{\ell=e}^{\tau} \sum\limits_{m=1}^{3} V_{\ell m}^{\ast} \overline{\nu_{m}} \gamma^{\mu} P_{L} \ell \\& - \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} W^+_{\mu} \sum\limits_{\ell=e}^{\tau} \sum\limits_{k=1}^{2} R_{\ell k}^{\ast} \overline{N^{c}_{k}} \gamma^{\mu} P_{L} \ell + {\rm h.c.}. \; \end{aligned} $
(6) Here,
$ V_{\ell m} $ is the neutrino mixing matrix, and we can measure its parameters from neutrino oscillation experiments. We neglect the contributions of light Majorana neutrinos to LNV processes because of their small masses.$ R_{\ell k} $ are the mixing elements between heavy Majorana neutrinos and charged-leptons, which can be parameterized as [41]$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} R_{\ell k}=\left|R_{\ell k}\right| {\rm e}^{{\rm i}\phi_{\ell k}} , \; \; \; \ell= e, \mu, \tau, \; \; \; k=1, 2 . \end{array} $
(7) Now, we give the mixing relations between neutrino flavor eigenstates and mass eigenstates as follows [42]:
$ \nu_{\ell L} = \sum\limits_{m=1}^{3} V_{\ell m} \nu_{m L} + \sum\limits_{k=1}^{2} R_{\ell k} N^{c}_{kL} \; . $
(8) Complex phases,
$ \phi_{\ell k} $ , contribute toCPviolation when there is interference from two different heavy Majorana neutrinos and can be determined in possible collider experiments. The constraints on the mixing parameters between heavy Majorana neutrinos and leptons have been investigated in previous studies [43,44]. According to the constraints on the mixing parameters, in the range$ 15 $ GeV$ GeV, the parameters in the following range all satisfy the constraints:$ \begin{aligned}[b] & \left|R_{e i}\right|^2 \leq8\times10^{-6} \; ,\quad\; \; \left|R_{\mu i}\right|^2 \leq1\times10^{-5},\; \; \\& \left|R_{\tau i}\right|^2 \leq1\times10^{-5} \; , \quad\; {\rm for} \; \; i = 1, 2 \; . \end{aligned} $
(9) For convenience, we set these parameters as
$\left|R_{e i}\right|^2 = 8\times 10^{-6}, ~ \left|R_{\mu i}\right|^2 =1\times10^{-5}, ~ \left|R_{\tau i}\right|^2 =1\times10^{-5}$ and take the case in which two generations of heavy Majorana neutrinos are nearly degenerate, where$ \Delta m=m_{N_2}-m_{N_1} $ . We also consider the result when$ \Delta m=m_{N_2}-m_{N_1}=20 $ GeV to observe the effects of$ \Delta m $ in our study. -
As mentioned before, many processes generating heavy Majorana neutrinos have been investigated; however, their generation processes have backgrounds that are not negligible, some of which influenceCPviolation. Therefore, we choose an approach that is clean enough to generate heavy Majorana neutrinos at future lepton colliders. We find that the processes
$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow W^+W^-,W^\pm\rightarrow N\ell^\pm $ are clean in that no obvious backgrounds and noCPviolation is observed inWpair production. For convenience, we take$ \ell^\pm=\mu^\pm $ in our calculation. First, we want to see if it is possible to search for heavy Majorana neutrinos in the processes of$ W^+W^- $ pair production.Wpair production can be expressed as$e^+(\mu^+)(l_2)+e^-(\mu^-)(l_1)\rightarrow W^+(k_p)+ W^-(k_m)$ , where$ l_1 $ ,$ l_2 $ ,$ k_p $ , and$ k_m $ are the four-momentum of the corresponding particles, and its cross section can be written as$ \sigma=\frac{1}{2s}\int {\rm d}{\cal L}_{ips2}\overline{\left|{\cal M}\right|^2}. $
(10) Here,sdenotes the center-of-mass energy squared, and
${\rm d}{\cal L}_{ips2}$ represents the two-body Lorentz invariant phase space of the final particles.$ \overline{\left|{\cal M}\right|^2} $ is the squared scattering amplitude averaged (summed) over the initial (final) particles, which can be expressed as$ \begin{align} \overline{\left|{\cal M}\right|^2} = \; & \frac{1}{4} \left(\overline{\left|{\cal M}_{\rm SM}\right|^2}+\overline{\left|{\cal M}_{\rm NP}\right|^2}+2{\rm Re}\overline{\left[{\cal M}_{\rm SM} {\cal M}_{\rm NP}^\ast\right]}\right) , \end{align} $
(11) $ \begin{aligned}[b] \overline{\left|{\cal M}_{\rm SM}\right|^2} =\; & g^4\biggl\{\text{sin}^4\theta_w\left|D_\gamma(q)\right|^2{\cal T}_\gamma+\left|D_Z(q)\right|^2{\cal T}_Z\\&+\frac{1}{4}\left|D_\nu(p_n)\right|^2{} -\text{sin}^2\theta_w{\cal F}_{12}\\&+\frac{1}{2}\text{sin}^2\theta_w{\cal F}_{13}-\frac{1}{2}{\cal F}_{23} \}\; , \end{aligned} $
(12) $ \begin{align} \overline{\left|{\cal M}_{\rm NP}\right|^2} =\; & \frac{g^4\left|R_{eN}\right|^4}{4}\biggl\{{\cal T}_n\left(\left|D_{N_1}(p_n)\right|^2+\left|D_{N_2}(p_n)\right|^2\right)+{\cal F}_{45}\}\; , \end{align} $
(13) $ \begin{aligned}[b] 2{\rm Re}\overline{\left[{\cal M}_{\rm SM} {\cal M}_{\rm NP}^\ast\right] }=\; & g^4\biggl\{\frac{\text{sin}^2\theta_w\left|R_{eN}\right|^2}{2}\left({\cal F}_{14}+{\cal F}_{15}\right)\\&-\frac{\left|R_{eN}\right|^2}{2}\left({\cal F}_{24}+{\cal F}_{25}\right){} \\ &+\frac{\left|R_{eN}\right|^2}{4}{\cal T}_n\left({\cal F}_{34}+{\cal F}_{35}\right) \}\; , \end{aligned} $
(14) where
$ q=l_1+l_2 $ ,$ p_n=l_1-k_m $ ,$\overline{\left|{\cal M_{\rm SM}}\right|^2}$ is the contribution from the SM part,$\overline{\left|{\cal M_{\rm NP}}\right|^2}$ is the contribution from the NP part, and$2{\rm Re}\overline{\left[{\cal M}_{\rm SM} {\cal M}_{\rm NP}^\ast\right]}$ is from the interference between the contributions of the SM and NP parts. The explicit expressions of$ D_\gamma $ ,$ D_Z $ ,$ D_\nu $ ,$ D_{N_1} $ ,$ D_{N_2} $ ,$ {\cal T}_\gamma $ ,$ {\cal T}_Z $ ,$ {\cal T}_n $ ,$ {\cal F}_{12} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{13} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{23} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{45} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{14} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{15} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{24} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{25} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{34} $ , and$ {\cal F}_{35} $ in the amplitude are shown in Appendix A. To observe obviousCPviolation, we take two heavy Majorana neutrinos in the nearly degenerate case most of the time, except when we study the influence of$ \Delta m $ onCPviolation and the cross section of$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow W^+ W^- $ in the NP part.$ W^\pm $ pairs are produced directly from this type of lepton-antilepton collision. In the SM view of lepton collisions, there are no heavy Majorana neutrinos in the decay channels. To consider the contribution of physics beyond the SM, we take two right-handed Majorana neutrinos into account as propagators of thetchannel in lepton-antilepton collisions. We calculate the cross section ofWpair production, and the result of$\Delta\sigma/\sigma_{\rm SM}$ is shown inFig. 1, where$\Delta\sigma=\sigma_{\rm total}-\sigma_{\rm SM}$ ,$ m_{N_1}=15 $ GeV, and$ \left|R_{e i}\right|^2 =8\times10^{-6} $ . The black lines show that the two neutrinos are nearly degenerate, and the spot lines correspond to$\Delta m=m_{N_2}- m_{N_1}=20$ GeV, where they are not nearly degenerate. (a) and (b) show the difference between cross sections in$ e^+e^-\rightarrow W^+W^- $ and$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow W^+W^- $ . We can see that$ \Delta\sigma $ represents the contribution of the NP part, which is too small when compared to the cross section of the SM part; hence, it is difficult to study Majorana neutrinos in the$ W^+W^- $ pair production sector, and we should search for them in rareWdecay.
Figure 1.Cross section
$\Delta\sigma=\sigma_{\rm total}-\sigma_{\rm SM}$ of (a)$ e^+e^-\rightarrow W^+W^- $ and (b)$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow W^+W^- $ compared with the cross section of the SM part$\Delta\sigma/\sigma_{\rm SM}$ as a function of centre-of-mass energy$ \sqrt{s} $ . The black curves represent the case in which two heavy Majorana neutrinos are nearly degenerate, and the dotted curves correspond to the case in which$ \Delta m=m_{N_2}-m_{N_1}=20 $ GeV, where$ m_{N_1}=15 $ GeV.We calculate the total cross section of the process
$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow W^\pm W^\mp\rightarrow \ell^\pm\ell^\pm+4j $ . In this study, we take$ \ell = \mu $ , and the case of$ \ell = e $ can be analyzed using the same method. According to Eq. (7), there are phases in the mixing parameters$ R_{\ell k} $ . When there is interference between different heavy Majorana neutrinos, one term appears, which we refer to as theCPphase$\Delta\phi= \phi_{\ell N_2}-\phi_{\ell N_1}$ . This phase also influences the total cross section and causes the difference between the cross sections of$ e^+e^-\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^+4j $ and$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow \ell^-\ell^-4j $ , which leads toCPviolation. The results of the total cross section of$ e^+e^-\rightarrow \ell^\pm\ell^\pm 4j $ and$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow \ell^\pm\ell^\pm 4j $ are shown inFig. 2, where the total cross sections are functions of$ \sqrt{s} $ . To observe the difference between$ e^+e^- (\mu^+\mu^-) \rightarrow \ell^+\ell^++4j $ and$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow \ell^-\ell^-+4j $ clearly, theCPphase is set to$ \Delta\phi=-3\pi/5 $ , whereCPviolation is close to the maximum value [14]. The cross sections reach the maximum at approximately$ \sqrt{s}=190 $ GeV. To observe the influence of theCPphase$ \Delta\phi $ on cross section, we present the result of the cross sections as a function of$ \Delta\phi $ inFig. 3. The total cross sections of$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow W^+W^-\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^+4j $ and$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow W^+W^- \rightarrow \mu^-\mu^-4j $ reach the maximum at approximately$ \Delta\phi=-0.1\pi $ and$ \Delta\phi=0.1\pi $ , respectively. We also calculate the events and total cross sections at future lepton colliders for$ e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^+4j $ and$e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-) \rightarrow \ell^-\ell^-4j$ with$ \Delta\phi=-\pi/10 $ and$ \Delta\phi= \pi/10 $ separately at$ \sqrt{s}= $ 190 GeV and$ m_{N_1}=15 $ GeV. The events for$ e^+e^-\rightarrow \ell^\pm\ell^\pm 4j $ with a luminosity of${\cal L}= 3000~\rm fb^{-1}$ can reach 13 with$\sigma_{\rm total}=4.6\times 10^{-3}~\rm fb$ , whereas for$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow \ell^\pm\ell^\pm 4j $ with a luminosity of${\cal L}=1000~\rm fb^{-1}$ , they can reach 4 with$\sigma_{\rm total}=4.6\times 10^{-3}~\rm fb$ . Therefore, it is possible to find heavy Majorana neutrinos at future lepton colliders at a luminosity of${\cal L}=1000~\rm fb^{-1}$ or higher. We then analyze theCPviolation in the process$\ell^+\ell^-\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^+4j$ , where$ \ell^+\ell^-=e^+e^- $ or$ \mu^+\mu^- $ , and we define theCPviolation as
Figure 2.Total cross section of (a)
$ e^+e^-\rightarrow \mu^\pm\mu^\pm 4j $ and (b)$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow \mu^\pm\mu^\pm 4j $ as functions of$ \sqrt{s} $ . TheCPphase is set to$ \Delta\phi=\phi_{\ell N_2}-\phi_{\ell N_1}=-3\pi/5 $ , and$ m_{N_1}=15 $ GeV, where two heavy Majorana neutrinos are nearly degenerate.
Figure 3.Total cross section of (a)
$ e^+e^-\rightarrow \mu^\pm\mu^\pm 4j $ and (b)$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow \mu^\pm\mu^\pm 4j $ as functions of theCPphase$ \Delta\phi $ .$ \sqrt{s}=190 $ GeV and$ m_{N_1}= $ 15 GeV, where two heavy Majorana neutrinos are nearly degenerate.$ \begin{eqnarray} {\cal A}_{CP}=\frac{{\rm Br}(\ell^+\ell^-\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^+4j)-{\rm Br}(\ell^+\ell^-\rightarrow \mu^-\mu^-4j)}{{\rm Br}(\ell^+\ell^-\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^+4j)+{\rm Br}(\ell^+\ell^-\rightarrow \mu^-\mu^-4j)}\;, \end{eqnarray} $
(15) and then we define
$ h=\Delta m/\Gamma_{N_1} $ , where$ \Gamma_{N_1} $ is the total decay width of a heavy Majorana neutrino$ N_1 $ , and its influence onCPviolation is presented inFig. 4. We can see thatCPviolation of$ e^+e^-\rightarrow \mu^\pm\mu^\pm 4j $ reaches the maximum value at approximately$ h=1 $ , the same as in$\mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow \mu^\pm\mu^\pm 4j$ . -
Neutrino oscillation experiments show that neutrinos have minor non-zero masses, which insinuates the existence of NP beyond the SM. If we extend the SM by introducing heavy Majorana neutrinos and allowing for LNV, we can explain the tiny neutrino masses via seesaw mechanisms and the baryon asymmetry of the Universe. In this paper, we investigate the prospect of searching for heavy Majorana neutrinos in rareWdecays at future lepton colliders, such as the CLIC, ILC, and MuC. The LNV process can be used as a probe to find NP.CPviolation exists in this type of rare decay ofWpairs. The significant interference of contributions from two different Majorana neutrinos producesCPviolation between
$W^+\rightarrow \ell^+_\alpha\ell^+_\beta(\bar{q}q^\prime)^-$ and$ W^-\rightarrow \ell^-_\alpha\ell^-_\beta(q\bar{q}^\prime)^+ $ . In this study, we analyze the process ofWpair production via$ e^+e^- $ and$ \mu^+\mu^- $ collisions at the CLIC and MuC, where we add two heavy Majorana neutrinos as the contributions of the NP part. The cross section of the NP part is too small inWpair production, and it is not possible to search for heavy Majorana neutrinos here. Instead, we must find them in rareWdecays. We find that for the case in which$ \Delta m $ is considerable, the cross section contributed by the NP part is significantly smaller when the neutrinos are nearly degenerate. We find that the total cross section of the process reaches the maxium value at approximately$ \sqrt{s}= $ 190 GeV. At$ \sqrt{s}=190 $ GeV, there are 13 events with a luminosity of${\cal L}=3000~\rm fb^{-1}$ for$e^+e^-\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^+4j$ and four events with a luminosity of${\cal L}=1000~ \rm fb^{-1}$ for$ \mu^+\mu^-\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^+4j $ . The investigation in this paper may help search for NP signals with respect to the LNV process via heavy Majorana neutrinos at future high energy lepton colliders. -
The authors thank the members of the Institute of Theoretical Physics of Shandong University for their helpful discussions.
-
In this appendix, we explicitly show the squared scattering amplitude given in Eqs. (11)–(14).The functions
$ {\cal F}_{12} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{13} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{23} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{45} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{14} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{15} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{24} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{25} $ ,$ {\cal F}_{34} $ , and$ {\cal F}_{35} $ can be expressed as$ {\cal F}_{12}={\cal T}_{\gamma Z}\left(D_\gamma D_Z^\ast+D_ZD_\gamma^\ast\right)\; ,\tag{A1} $
$ {\cal F}_{13}={\cal T}_{\gamma n}\left(D_\gamma D_\nu^\ast+D_\nu D_\gamma^\ast\right)\; ,\tag{A2} $
${\cal F}_{14}={\cal T}_{\gamma n}\left(D_\gamma D_{N_1}^\ast+D_{N_2}D_\gamma^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A3} $
${\cal F}_{15}={\cal T}_{\gamma n}\left(D_\gamma D_{N_2}^\ast+D_{N_2}D_\gamma^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A4} $
$ {\cal F}_{23}={\cal T}_{Zn}\left(D_Z D_{\nu}^\ast+D_{\nu}D_Z^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A5} $
$ {\cal F}_{24}={\cal T}_{Zn}\left(D_Z D_{N_1}^\ast+D_{N_1}D_Z^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A6} $
$ {\cal F}_{25}={\cal T}_{Zn}\left(D_Z D_{N_2}^\ast+D_{N_2}D_Z^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A7} $
$ {\cal F}_{34}={\cal T}_{n}\left(D_\nu D_{N_1}^\ast+D_{N_1}D_\nu^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A8} $
$ {\cal F}_{35}={\cal T}_{n}\left(D_\nu D_{N_2}^\ast+D_{N_2}D_\nu^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A9} $
${\cal F}_{45}={\cal T}_{n}\left(D_{N_1} D_{N_2}^\ast+D_{N_2}D_{N_1}^\ast \right)\; , \tag{A10} $
respectively, where
$ D_X(p^2) $ is the Breit-Wigner propagator, which can be defined as$ D_X(p^2)=\frac{1}{p^2-m^2_X+{\rm i} m_X\Gamma_X}\; , \tag{A11} $
with
$ m_X $ and$ \Gamma_X $ as the mass and total decay width of the corresponding particles.The explicit expressions of
$ {\cal T}_\gamma $ ,$ {\cal T}_Z $ ,$ {\cal T}_n $ ,$ {\cal T}_{\gamma Z} $ ,$ {\cal T}_{\gamma n} $ , and$ {\cal T}_{Z n} $ can be given by$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal T}_{\gamma}= & -24m_W^2s-\frac{2s^2t(s+t)}{m_W^4}-24(s^2+st+t^2)\\&+\frac{2s(3s^2+4st+t^2)}{m_W^2}\;, \end{aligned} \tag{A12}$
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal T}_{Z}=& \frac{(4\sin^2\theta_w-8\sin^4\theta_w-1)}{4m_W^4}\biggl\{12m_W^6s+s^2t(s+t)\\&+12m_W^4(s^2+st+t^2)-{} m_W^2s(3s^2+4st+4t^2)\}\;, \end{aligned}\tag{A13} $
$ {\cal T}_{n}=-m_W^2+(s-5t)t+\frac{(s-2t)t^2}{m_W^2}-\frac{t^3(s+t)}{m_W^4}\;, \tag{A14} $
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal T}_{\gamma Z}= & \frac{(1-4\sin^2\theta_w)}{2m_W^4}\biggl\{12m_W^6s+s^2t(s+t)\\&+12m_W^4(s^2+st+t^2)-m_W^2s(3s^2+4st+4t^2)\}\;, \end{aligned} \tag{A15}$
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal T}_{\gamma n}= & -6m_W^2s+\frac{st^2(s+t)}{m_W^4}-3(s^2+2t^2)\\&-\frac{t(2s^2+st+2t^2)}{m_W^2} \;, \end{aligned}\tag{A16} $
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal T}_{Zn}= & \frac{1-2\sin^2\theta_w}{2m_W^4}\biggl\{6m_W^6s-st^2(s+t)\\&+3m_W^4(s^2+2t^2)+m_W^2t(2s^2+st+2t^2)\}\;, \end{aligned}\tag{A17} $
where
$ s=2(l_1\cdot l_2) $ , and$ t=-2(l_2\cdot k_p) $ .
Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos at future lepton colliders
- Received Date:2022-12-20
- Available Online:2023-04-15
Abstract:A nonzero neutrino mass may be a sign of new physics beyond the standard model (SM). To explain the small neutrino mass, we can extend the SM using right-handed Majorana neutrinos in a low-scale seesaw mechanism, and theCPviolation effect can be induced due to theCPphase in the interference of heavy Majorana neutrinos. The existence of heavy Majorana neutrinos may lead to lepton number violation processes, which can be used to search for the signals of heavy Majorana neutrinos. In this paper, we focus on theCPviolation effect related to two generations of heavy Majorana neutrinos at


Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related
PDF
















DownLoad: