Level structure of the double-shell closure system withZ= 14 andN= 20:34Si

Figures(4)/Tables(2)

Get Citation
Chang-Bum Moon and Cenxi Yuan. Level structure of the double-shell closure system with Z= 14 and N= 20: 34Si[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac8a8c
Chang-Bum Moon and Cenxi Yuan. Level structure of the double-shell closure system with Z= 14 and N= 20: 34Si[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac8a8c shu
Milestone
Received: 2022-07-04
Article Metric

Article Views(2926)
PDF Downloads(30)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Email This Article

    Title:
    Email:

    Level structure of the double-shell closure system withZ= 14 andN= 20:34Si

      Corresponding author:Chang-Bum Moon,cbmoon@hoseo.edu
      Corresponding author:Cenxi Yuan,yuancx@mail.sysu.edu.cn
    • 1. Center for Exotic Nuclear Studies, The Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
    • 2. Sino-French Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China

      Abstract:The level structure of the double-magic nucleus34Si (Z= 14,N= 20) was investigated by evaluating the available data. On the basis of experimental results from the beta-decay and fusion-evaporation reactions, we established the level scheme by assigning spin-parities up to 61+at 6233 keV. The high energy positions of the excited states are consistent with the magicity at34Si, such as the 22+state of the spherical ground band at 4.519 MeV and the 3-, 4-, and 5-states of the one-particle one-hole cross-shell states at approximately 4.5 MeV. This nucleus, for a long time, has attracted much attention because of, on one side, a proton bubble structure in the ground state and, on the other side, a deformation in the second 0+state, 02+. By a comparison of the constructed level scheme with the shell model calculations, we describe the emerging structures in the ground and second 0+states and the negative-parity 3-states within the framework of the shell model context. We propose a deformed rotational band with the cascading 62+− 41+− 21+transitions built on the 02+state.

        HTML

        I. INTRODUCTION
        • Historically, magic nuclei are famous, similar to inert gas elements. The emergence of a large shell gap leads to more stability for these nuclei in comparison with neighboring nuclei. By introducing a strong spin-orbital coupling term into the single-particle potential, the magic numbers could finally be reproduced, such as 28, 50, 82, and 126. The corresponding spin (s)-orbital (l) doublets involved in generating these numbers aref7/2-f5/2(l= 3),g9/2-g7/2(l= 4),h11/2-h9/2(l= 5), andi13/2-i11/2(l= 6), respectively. Here,ldenotes the angular momentum number, and the subscript indicates the total spin number,j=l±s. Notice that those are the highestlvalue orbitals for each harmonic oscillator (principal) numberN. In addition, the numbers of 14 and 6, which are based on shell gaps due to splits of thed5/2-d3/2(l= 2) andp3/2-p1/2(l= 1) orbitals, should be regarded as magic numbers as well.

          The nuclei14C (Z= 6,N= 8),34Si (Z= 14,N= 20), and68Ni (Z= 28,N= 40) have a common shell character; proton magic-numbers occur due to spin-orbital splits, while neutron numbers occur due to harmonic oscillator shell gaps. From these, we examine the level structure of34Si. To date, the excited states of34Si have been identified for an energy of up toEx= 6233 keV, but the spin-parity assignment has been made only for the first 2+, 3-and the second 0+, 2+states [17]. Moreover, no overall study of the level structure of this nucleus has been made. Instead, most studies are concerned with identifying the second 0+state to prove the deformed $2\hbar \omega $ pf-shell nature [211] and the bubble matter distribution of the protons in the spherical ground state [1214]. In this work, we first construct the level scheme from existing data, then compare it to those of the neighboring isotones withN= 20 and finally discuss the underlying shell and collective structures using large-scale shell-model approaches.

        II. AVAILABLE DATA ANALYSIS
        • Figure 1shows the currently-known level scheme of34Si. The 2+and 3-states were firstly identified through theβ-decay of34Al [24]. The levels at 4379 and 4969 keV were tentatively assigned (3-, 4-, 5-) on the basis of logft values [4]. The 4519 keV level was also observed inβ-decay measurements [4,8]. Conversely, the levels at 4920 and 6233 keV were observed only in a fusion-evaporation reaction,18O (18O, 2p)34Si [5]. The second 0+at 2719 keV, including the populated 607-keV transition, has been identified using positron-electron internal pair-creation spectroscopy on theβ-decay of34Al [6].

          Figure 1.A partial level scheme of34Si as observed from theβ-decay of34Al [24,6] and the results of in-beam gamma-ray spectroscopy of the18O(18O, 2p)34Si reaction [5].

          By looking closely at the γ-ray transitional properties of the18O (18O, 2p)34Si reaction [5], we are able to assign spin-parities with an argument concerning fusion-evaporation reactions. Generally, the fusion-evaporation reaction yields mainly yrast states, which are the lowest levels in energy for a given spin. According to the γ-ray intensities from a given level scheme in Ref. [5], the yrast states were found to be along the 6233 - 4969 - 4379 - 4255 (3-) - 3326 (2+) keV line. Thus, the 4379, 4969, and 6233 keV levels could be assigned the spinsJ= 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Among them, the 4379 and 4969 keV levels were suggestive of negative parity states, possibly (3-,4-,5-) fromβ-decay measurements [1,4]. Accordingly, we propose the 4969 and 4379 keV levels to be 5-and 4-, respectively. We find that the 1594-keV transition from the 4920 keV to the 2+level at 3326 keV is relatively strong in intensity. Further, the 4920-keV level has another branch with a weak intensity connected to the 3-state at 4255 keV. Consequently, the 4920-keV level is supposed to have spins of 4 rather than of 3. Considering the higher probability ofE2 thanM2 transitions, we assign the 4920- and 6233-keV levels to be 4+and 6+, respectively. Finally, let us look at the 4519-keV level with a 1193-keV transition connected to the 2+state at 3326 keV. The 1193-keV transition has been observed in bothβ-decay and in-beam fusion-evaporation γ-ray measurements. Further, this transition was also seen in theβ-decay of the 1+isomer of34Al from the precursor34Mg nucleus [8]. Thereby, a spin assignment of 3 should be excluded. Moreover, observation from the in-beam reaction [5] excludes the possibility of 0+or 1+. Eventually, this level must be 2+. Our assignment is certainly consistent with the recent result by Hanet al. [9].

          We show the constructed level scheme of34Si inFig. 2, in which the level schemes of the isotones36S and38Ar are also included. At first glance, a similarity appears for the negative-parity states 3-, 4-, and 5-.

          Figure 2.(color online) The level schemes of34Si (a) as obtained from the present work,36S (b), and38Ar (c) [1]. For comparison, the negative states are denoted in yellow.

          As will be discussed below, these negative-parity states are associated with neutron one particle-one hole excitations across theN= 20 shell gap. What we notice next is that the second 2+states show a similar property, connecting the first 2+states. Despite no observation of the 4+state in36S, the 4+and 6+states of34Si show a similar pattern to those of38Ar. Overall, we conclude that our spin assignments of the observed excited states in34Si are reasonable. In addition, as we will see later, the large-scale shell-model calculations prove that the present result is correct.

        III. CALCULATIONS AND DISCUSSION
        • To explain the underlying nuclear structure of the presented level scheme of34Si, we performed theoretical calculations with a large-scale shell model. The space spans overd5/2,s1/2,d3/2,f7/2, andp3/2for both protons and neutrons. The used effective shell-model interaction was sdpf-m [15]. The calculations were performed with the shell-model code, KSHELL [16,17]. In this calculation, up to three particle-three hole (0 − 3 $\hbar\omega $ ) configurations were employed. It is found that the neutron cross-shell excitations are rather dominant over the protons, leading to the neutron (d5/2)6(d3/2s1/2)4(f7/2p3/2)2configurations. This is more evident at the onset of deformation when they are between orbitals acrossN= 20 with spin-differences of two units Δj= 2. In this case, the spherical closed-shell configuration has a zero particle-zero hole character, whereas the deformed configuration has a two-particle-two-hole configuration from the occupied orbital,d3/2, to the empty valence orbital,f7/2. The level structure derived from our shell-model calculations is displayed inFig. 3, in which the constructed level scheme is also included for comparison. For discussion, we denote the values of the predicted quadrupole transition strengths. Here, the effective charges used wereep= 1.5efor protons anden= 0.5efor neutrons. As is apparent inFig. 3, the shell model predictions agree well with the experimental data.

          Figure 3.(color online) (a) Level scheme of34Si proposed by the present work. (b) The predicted level scheme of34Si according to the large-scale shell-model calculations over the space ofd5/2,s1/2,d3/2,f7/2, andp3/2for both protons and neutrons. Numbers in parentheses are the expected electric quadrupole transition strengths,B(E2;J+2→J), in e2fm4. The experimental value in (a) is from [6].

          In Table 1, we show the calculated probabilities of the main configurations for the states of interest. The ground state is found to exhibit the dominance of both proton (π) and neutron (ν) closed shells, indicating the π(d5/2)6ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2(d3/2)4configuration with 73%. However, we find that two-neutron excitations fromd3/2tof7/2, (d3/2)2(f7/2)2contribute as well, which amounts to about 8%. On the contrary, the proton excitations to thes1/2orbital acrossZ= 14 are negligible. Hence, we see that a large depletion occurs at the center of the proton matter. This toroidal-like structure, sometimes called a bubble structure, in the ground state has been proven experimentally by one proton removal reaction [13]. In contrast to the ground state, the excited 22+, 31+, 23+, and 32+states are produced dominantly by occupations of the protons1/2orbital. From the ground state to the first 6+state through the first 2+and 4+states, the π(d5/2)6ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2(d3/2)2(f7/2)2component increases rapidly. The calculated 21+, 41+, and 61+energies are in good agreement with the experimental data. Here, the 61+state can be understood in terms of full spin alignment of the neutronf7/2orbital. This type of energetically favored state has been commonly observed as a spin trap caused by a non-collective oblate distribution.

          The second 0+, 02+state is certainly reproduced in energy by the neutron two particles-two holes (d3/2)2(f7/2)2configuration, which amounts to about 40%, including a protons1/2excitation with 9%. Moreover, the expected value, 77 e2fm4, of the reduced quadrupole transitional strength,B(E2;21+to 02+) is consistent with that of the experimental result, 61(40). According to the monopole strength in [6], this second 0+state was found to have a deformation with β = 0.29(4). To confirm this result, we investigated a level crossing between thed3/2andf7/2orbitals using a deformed shell model with a stretched harmonic oscillator potential. It is found that the crossing between thed3/2[2, 2, 3/2, 3/2] orbital and thef7/2[3, 3, 7/2, 1/2] orbital occurs aroundε2= 0.22. Here, [2, 2, 3/2, 3/2] indicates the harmonic oscillator number (N), angular momentum (l), total spin (j), and total spin projection (jz), respectively, and the quadrupole deformation parameter ε2corresponds to 0.95β2. This result proves the deformation derived from the monopole transition strength.

          The negative-parity states 3, 4, and 5located above the 2+state are dominated by the neutron one particle-one hole excitation, viz., (d3/2)-1(f7/2)1by promoting a neutron from thed3/2orbital to thef7/2orbital, which is the π(d5/2)6v(d5/2)6(s1/2)2(d3/2)3(f7/2)1configuration in the last column ofTable 1. This one hole-one particle configuration energetically favors the generation of angular momenta 3to 5as shown inFig. 3(b). Even though the ordering of the 3-and 4-states is predicted to be reversed, this explains the small energy separation between them. In this configuration, two neutrons, on one hand, as a particle in thef7/2orbital and, on the other hand, as a hole in thed3/2orbital, yield the maximalspinsJ= 5 (7/2 + 3/2). Then, two neutrons favor organization in a doughnut distribution, as shown inFig. 4. In contrast to neutrons, no (or little) occupancyof the protons1/2orbital in these negative-parity states implies that the spherical core has a proton center depletion similar to the ground state. Recently, new experimental results for34Si were reported [18], and the suggested level structure and shell model descriptions strengthen our discussion of the present work.

          π(d5/2)6
          ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)4
          π(d5/2)6
          ν( d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)2(f7/2)2
          π(d5/2)5(s1/2)1
          ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)4
          π(d5/2)5(s1/2)1
          ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)2(f7/2)2
          π(d5/2)6
          ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)2(f7/2)1(p3/2)1
          π(d5/2)5(s1/2)1
          ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)3(f7/2)1
          π(d5/2)6
          ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2
          (d3/2)3(f7/2)1
          0+
          2+
          4+
          6+
          02+
          22+
          31+
          42+
          23+
          32+
          24+
          5+
          62+
          1+
          3
          4
          5
          73



          6











          8
          26
          31
          42
          29
          10

          17
          8

          32

          22
          26







          34
          24

          30
          36







          13
          9
          6
          9
          7
          9
          10

          9
          6

          14
          10








          7
          9
          10
          5
          8
          22
















          5
          5














          61
          62
          65

          Table 1.Shell model calculations for contributions, %, of the orbital configurations of34Si. The shell model is based on the sdfp-m interaction including $2\hbar\omega $ pfshell two particle-two hole excitations.

          Figure 4.(color online) Occupancies of the orbitals involved in the states observed in34Si. Following the shell model results, some distinctive structures are indicated in the level scheme.

          A surprising outcome occurs at 62+. Comparing the configurational probabilities between 61+and 62+, the dominance of the π(d5/2)6ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2(d3/2)2(f7/2)2configuration, 42%, at 61+weakens at 62+, 22%. Instead, at the 62+state, the π(d5/2)5(s1/2)1ν(d5/2)6(s1/2)2(d3/2)2(f7/2)2and π(d5/2)6ν(d5/2)5(s1/2)1(d3/2)2(f7/2)2configurations contribute largely, 14% and 12% (not shown inTable 1), respectively. Such broad contributions, namely the richness of configuration mixing, might induce a deformed collective structure at 62+. In fact, the quadrupole transition of 62+to 41+is stronger by two times than that of 61+to 41+. We find that such strong quadrupole strengths are maintained along the 62+→41+→21+→02+cascade with values near 60 − 80 e2fm4, which are 10 to 13 times the Weisskopf single-particle transition unit. Further, the cascading energies, 2290-1448-862 keV, definitely show a rotational pattern. We propose a deformed rotational band built on the second 0+, as shown inFig. 3(b). To confirm our suggestion, the second 6+state needs to be identified by an experiment. Interestingly, we find a γ-ray peak at and near 1940 keV inFig. 2in Ref. [5], where the coincidence γ-ray spectra gated on the 3326 and 929-keV transitions are displayed. We suggest that this peak might be the γ-ray transition of the 62+state, which corresponds to the6860-keV level, to the4+state at 4920 keV. It is also interesting to find a close resemblance between the collective bands, the 62+- 41+- 21+- 02+sequence in34Si and the 62+- 41+- 22+- 02+sequence in38Ar.

          A spherical ground band consists of the 22+and 43+states. The doubly magic nature of34Si is indicated by the high energy positions of the 22+state at 4.519 MeV and the 3-, 4-, and 5-states of the one-particle one-hole cross-shell states at around 4.5 MeV, and the calculatedE(43+/22+) = 1.38. As a doubly magic nucleus, the 2+state of the spherical ground band has the highest energy among all even-even nuclei withZ= 10 ~ 18 [1]. In this view, all excitation states stay relatively high with a smallE(4+/2+) value compared with other nuclei. The structure of34Si is similar to that of many spherical nuclides with a large shell gap (magic shells), such as68Ni [1].

          In another view, taking the 02+state as a reference,E(41+/21+) = 2.68 is calculated, indicating certain deformation and a possible γ-soft nature, as shown with theO(6) limit of the interacting boson model (IBM) [19,20]. Such observations show the co-existence structure of34Si, with the spherical 01+state and deformed 02+state. Combining the observed data, the present shell-model calculation, IBM, and the discussion in Ref. [18], the 02+, 21+, 41+, and 62+states belong to a deformed band of γ-soft nature, while the 23+, 31+, and 42+states can be assigned to the corresponding γ-vibrational band.

          As seen in Table 1, all 02+, 21+, 41+, and 62+states have a similar configuration and structure, forming a rotational band with strong in-band transitions. A γ-soft state should have certain large transition strengths from states outside the band because of the mixing between different bands. As seen from the shell-model results, all 2+states except for the 21+state have extremely weak transition strengths to the 02+state. For the 21+and 41+states, several states decay to them with transition strengths of 30 ~ 40 e2fm4.Table 2compares theB(E2) transitions between the present shell-model calculation and the IBMO(6) limit. The transition rates generally agree with theO(6) limit for 41+→ 21+, 31+→ 41+, 42+→ 21+, and 42+→ 41+. However, for the transition rates related to the 23+state, the deviations between the shell model and theO(6) limit become large. The energies andB(E2) values for the γ-soft states are rather consistent with theO(6) limit, though there seems to be a certain mixing between theK= 0 andK= 2 bands. More γ-ray transitional investigations, namely timing measurements, are essential for understanding34Si, especially the possible γ-soft rotational band and the mixing between different bands.

          Ji→ Jf Shell-modelB(E2)
          in unit e2fm4
          Shell-modelB(E2)
          in unitB(E2; 21+→ 02+)
          IBMO(6) limitB(E2)
          in unitB(E2; 21+→ 02+)
          21+→ 02+
          41+→ 21+
          62+→ 41+
          42+→ 23+
          31+→ 23+
          31+→ 41+
          23+→ 21+
          42+→ 21+
          42+→ 41+
          77.1
          84.3
          62.7
          16.7
          34.9
          32.2
          29.0
          29.5
          46.2
          1
          1.09
          0.81
          0.22
          0.45
          0.42
          0.38
          0.38
          0.60
          1
          10/7 ≈ 1.43
          5/3 ≈ 1.67
          55/63 ≈ 0.87
          25/21 ≈ 1.19
          10/21 ≈ 0.48
          10/7 ≈ 1.43
          0
          50/63 ≈ 0.79

          Table 2.Shell model calculations forE2 transitions and comparison with IBMO(6) limit.

        IV. CONCLUSION
        • In conclusion, we successfully develop the existing level scheme of34Si by assigning spin-parities up to 6+to the available experimental data.Figure 4summarizes our results by showing distributions of the orbital occupancies for the states of interest together with the constructed level scheme. The observed states could be understood by finding certain differences in both the occupancies and contributions of the respective shell configurations as well as the resultant transition strengths. For example, the dominance of either protons or neutrons andthe extent of mixing of their configurations are directly related to an understanding of the emerging features, i.e., nuclear shapes, singles or collective degrees of freedom, and specific matter distributions. As denoted by the collectivityand non-collectivity inFig. 4, the distinctive level properties are noted; a proton center depletion due to the emptys1/2orbital of the spherical ground state, a neutron two particle-two hole, (d3/2)-2(f7/2)2configuration in the deformed second 0+state, a neutron one hole-one particle, (d3/2)-1(f7/2)1configuration for the negative parity states, and non-collective fully-aligned spin states,ν[(d3/2)-1(f7/2)1]5−andν[(f7/2)2]6+. The proposed rotational band, as predicted by the second 6+state, is built on the second 0+state in34Si and provides new insights into shape co-existence in isotones withN= 20;32Mg,36S,38Ar, and40Ca.

      Reference (20)

      目录

      /

      Return
      Return
        Baidu
        map