Low-lying states of^92,93Nb excited in the reactions induced by the weakly-bound nucleus⁶Li near the Coulomb barrier

Over the past few years, much effort in both theory and experiment has been directed to the study of reactions induced by weakly-bound nuclei, especially the elastic scattering, breakup and fusion [1-5]. The occurrence of breakup of weakly-bound nuclei may lead to further reactions, which makes the whole reaction process more complicated [4].^92,93Nb are the residues of the⁶Li+⁸⁹Y experiment performed at LNL-INFN in Italy, with the goal of studying the reaction mechanisms of a weakly-bound nuclear system [6,7]. In the following, the processes that produce^92,93Nb nuclei and that involve fusion-evaporation and can be identified with γ-particle coincidence measurements are discussed. Since gamma-gamma coincidence measurements were performed in the present experiment, it was an opportunity to further explore the level schemes of^92,93Nb.

It is well known that the level structure of nucleiN=50,51 is dominated by single-particle excitations, even for states with high spin. On the other hand, nuclei withN≥55 exhibit collective behavior [8,9].

As it si a nearly spherical nucleus withN=51 intheA~90 mass region, the studies of the excited states of⁹²Nb are of importance for establishing and testing the residual interactions in shell model calculations. Previously, the level structure of⁹²Nb was mainly investigated by proton and³He induced reactions [10-13], and the energies of excited states were extended up to 3797 keV by the⁸⁸Sr (⁷Li, 3n)⁹²Nb experiment [14]. Recently, high-spin states of⁹²Nb were studied in the heavy ion fusion-evaporation reaction⁸²Se (¹⁴N,4n)⁹²Nb [15]. For the middle-low excited states of⁹²Nb, the information is relatively scarce, and thus it is important to further explore this nucleus experimentally. From the theoretical point of view,⁹²Nb was studied within the framework of the shell model, and its low-lying levels belowE_level=2287 keV [12] were described by taking the even-even nucleus⁸⁸Sr as the inert core, while the valance nucleons occupy the πp_1/2,g_9/2and νd_5/2orbitals. Nevertheless, from the theoretical point of view, further study of⁹²Nb is still necessary.

As a “transitional” nucleus withN=52, the excitation of⁹³Nb is relative intricate [8]. In an earlier work,⁹³Nb was studied in the (n,nγ) and (p,2nγ) reactions [16]. TheI^π=3/2^-at 1840 keV andI^π=5/2^-at 2013 keV were identified as mixed-symmetry states, which can be viewed as low-energy collective modes where protons and neutrons move uncoupled. High-spin states were studied in the⁸²Se(¹⁶O,p4n)⁹³Nb reaction, with the level schemes up to excitation energy of 11 MeV [17]. An M1 rotational band was reported and showed the characteristics of oblate collective rotational band. The investigation of the level structure of⁹³Nb can provide additional information for a systematic study of nuclei withN=52.

In this work, the low-lying structure of⁹²Nb was further studied, and its proposed level scheme was calculated using the shell model code NushellX with SNE valence space, and compared with the experimental results. In addition, two new transitions were observed in⁹³Nb, as discussed in the following section.

The study of the⁶Li+⁸⁹Y reaction was performed at LNL-INFN in Italy. A 550 μg/cm²⁸⁹Y target, which was supported by a 340 μg/cm²¹²C foil, was bombarded by theE_lab=34 MeV⁶Li³⁺beam with an average intensity of 1.0 enA, provided by the Tandem-XTU accelerator. The γ-rays were detected by the GALILEO array, which is composed of 25 Compton-suppressed high-purity germanium (BGO-HPGe) detectors arranged in 4 rings: 10 at 90° and 15 at 119°, 129°, 152° with respect to the beam direction [18]. The EUCLIDES 4π Si-telescope array, which consists of 5 segmented and 35 single plates of ΔE/ESi telescopes (the thicknesses of the ΔE and E detectors are 130 μm and 1000 μm, respectively) was used to collect the emitted light charged particles [19]. The distance between the center of the Si telescopes and the center of the target was around 6.2 cm. An Al cylinder was inserted inside EUCLIDES, so that backward angles larger than 150° were unshielded. The thickness of the Al cylinder was 200 μm, so as to stop the intense scattered beam particles from destroying the Si detectors. The energy and efficiency calibrations of each Ge detector in the real geometrical conditions were performed with the following standard sources:⁶⁰Co,²⁴¹Am,¹³³Ba,¹⁵²Eu,⁸⁸Y, covering the energy region from 39.522 keV (¹⁵²Eu) to 2734 keV (⁸⁸Y). After further delicate energy calibrations and gain matching with characteristic γ-rays of the residual nuclei, the recorded γ-γ coincidence events were sorted into a two-dimensionalE_γ-E_γsymmetric matrix, and two asymmetric ADO matrices. In this experiment, about 14×10⁶γ-γ coincidence events (without any particle selection) were collected.

The fusion reaction induced by a weakly-bound projectile at near-barrier energies is complicated due to low breakup threshold [6,20]. When the projectile completely fuses with the target nucleus without breakup (BU), the process is a direct complete fusion (DCF). When the projectiles breakup, then: 1) if all the fragments fuse with the target nucleus, the process is a sequential complete fusion (SCF); or 2) if only part of the fragments fuse with the target nucleus, the process is an incomplete fusion (ICF) [6]. In addition, when a medium-mass target nucleus is involved, the fusion process can evaporate not only neutrons but also light charged particles including protons and alpha particles. In the present experiment,⁹²Nb can be produced in a complete fusion of⁶Li with the⁸⁹Y target nuclei, followed by the 1p2nevaporation channel. As a result, the characteristic γ-rays from⁹²Nb are in coincidence with protons emitted from the compound nucleus, as shown inFig. 1(a). In addition, the⁹²Mo residue from the reaction can only be produced by the CF process. The yield ratio of⁹²Nb to⁹²Mo (⁹²Nb/⁹²Mo) in the present experiment is around 0.38, which is larger than given by the statistical evaporation model (around 0.26). Such an increment of the⁹²Nb/⁹²Mo ratio indicates that the ICF process may contribute to the production of⁹²Nb.Fig. 1(b)shows the γ-ray spectrum measured in coincidence with deuterons, in which the characteristic gamma rays of⁹²Nb are clearly visible. It is concluded that⁹²Nb can also be populated in the ICF process of⁶Li, where alpha particles from the breakup of⁶Li fuse with the⁸⁹Y target nucleus, and simultaneously, the other fragment (deuteron) escapes and is detected. In summary, the⁹²Nb residue observed in this experiment was populated in the⁸⁹Y(⁶Li,p2n)⁹²Nb and⁸⁹Y(α,n)⁹²Nb reactions.

Figure 1.γ-energy spectra in coincidence with protons (a) and deuterons (b). Representative γ-rays from⁹²Nb and⁹³Nb are marked with black triangles and black circles, respectively.

The⁹³Nb residue in the present experiment can be produced by the complete fusion of⁶Li with⁸⁹Y , followed by the 1p1nevaporation channel, as can be seen in the proton gated spectrum shown inFig. 1(a). The cross-section for alpha particle stripping from⁶Li on a⁸⁹Y target producing⁹³Nb is small, and this process can be neglected.

The level structure of⁹²Nb was studied by several researchers [10-14]. The high-spin states of⁹²Nb were recently studied in the⁸²Se(¹⁴N,4n)⁹²Nb reaction by Wu et al [15]. The projectile used in the present experiment brings lower excitation energy to the compound nucleus, so that the relatively lower excited states of⁹²Nb can be populated and the middle-low level structure of⁹²Nb studied. The proposed level scheme of⁹²Nb is shown inFig. 2, which is extended up to ~5.4 MeV excitation energy, and 20 new transitions and 8 new levels are added to⁹²Nb. Sample coincidence spectra, gated on 2287, 387, 328 and 115 keV, are shown inFig. 3(a)-(d). The relative intensities (I_γ) and the initial and final states ( $ E_{\rm i}^\pi $ and $ E_{\rm f}^\pi $ ) of the observed transitions in⁹²Nb are summarized inTable 1.

Figure 2.Level scheme of⁹²Nb proposed by the present work. New transitions are denoted with asterisks. The width of arrows indicates relative intensity of γ-rays.

Figure 3.Typical prompt γ-γ coincidence spectra for⁹²Nb, gated on 2287, 387, 325, and 115 keV, respectively.

In order to obtain the multipolarity of the newly observed γ-rays, the angular distributions of each γ-ray from the oriented residues (ADO) were analyzed. Assuming that γ₁and γ₂are the cascading transitions in the same nucleus, the ADO ratio of γ₁is deduced byI_γ1(152°)/I_γ1(90°), whereI_γ1(152° or 90°) represents the intensity of γ₁-rays collected by the detectors at 152° or 90° , and in coincidence with γ₂-rays measured by all detectors. By calculating the ADO ratio of γ-rays with known multipolarity in⁹²Mo,⁹¹Mo,⁹²Nb,⁹³Nb,⁹⁰Zr,⁸⁹Zr produced in the present experiment, typical ADO ratiosI_γ(152°)/I_γ(90°) for quadrupole and dipole transitions are around 1.6 and 0.8, respectively, as shown inFig. 4(a). The spins of the states of⁹²Nb are assigned tentatively. For the two lower transitions, 97 and 126 keV, the intensity balance rule is used, which supports to some extent the spin assignment of the levels .

Figure 4.(color online) (a) Representative ADO ratios in⁹²Mo,⁹²Nb,⁹¹Mo,⁹³Nb,⁸⁹Zr,⁹⁰Zr. TypicalR_ADOis given as around 1.6 indicating stretched quadrupole (or ΔI=0) transition, and around 0.8 indicating stretched dipole transition; (b)R_ADOof transitions plotted against energies of γ-rays in⁹²Nb.

Two new transitions, 504 and 572 keV, are added to the level scheme of⁹³Nb feeding into the 2180 keV state, as shown inFig. 5. From the summed spectrum of 689 and 541 keV, shown inFig. 6, the peaks of the new transitions 504 and 572 keV can be clearly seen. The ADO ratios for the two transitions are 1.45 and 0.94, indicating quadrupole and dipole properties, respectively. Therefore, the spins of the 2752 keV and 2684 keV states are assigned as 21/2, and 19/2, respectively. The relative intensities of partial γ-rays from⁹³Nb are given inTable 2.

Figure 5.Level scheme of⁹³Nb proposed in the present work. New transitions are marked with asterisks. The width of the arrows indicates the relative intensity of γ-rays.

Figure 6.Typical prompt γ-γ coincidence spectrum for⁹³Nb with two new transitions marked with asterisks.

The excitation of a nearly spherical nucleus is usually considered to be of two types: single particle excitations inside a major shell, and excitations that cross the shell gap(s) [21]. The core excitation has been previously reported inA~90 neighboring nuclei, e.g.,⁸⁹Y [22],^91-94Mo [8,23-25], and^94-96Ru [26], which exhibit the characteristics of several parallel transitions with energy around 2 MeV feeding into the same level. The low-lying states may be dominated by single particle excitations inside one major shell. As it is a nearly spherical nucleus, the states of⁹²Nb should be amenable to shell model calculations.

In order to study the levels in⁹²Nb, we performed shell model calculations with the code NushellX. The SNE model space and SNET interaction were adopted, which were previously used for level structures of nearly spherical nuclei⁸⁵Br [27],⁹⁶Ru [26],⁹⁴Mo [8]. The model space includes 8 proton orbitals (1f_5/2, 2p_3/2, 2p_1/2, 1g_9/2, 1g_7/2, 2d_5/2, 2d_3/2, 3s_1/2) and 9 neutron orbitals (1f_5/2, 2p_3/2, 2p_1/2, 1g_9/2, 1g_7/2, 2d_5/2, 2d_3/2, 3s_1/2, 1h_11/2) relative to the inert⁵⁶Ni (Z= 28,N= 28) core.

The low-excited states of⁹²Nb behave like single particle excitation, and thus we describe the low-excited states of⁹²Nb as pure configurations, which means that each state corresponds to one proton orbital and one neutron orbital. The pure configuration calculations were also carried out for the low-excited states of⁹¹Zr,⁹³Mo,⁹⁵Ru [28]. Since the Fermi levels of⁹²Nb lie at the πg_9/2and νd_5/2orbitals, the quasi-magic nucleus⁹⁰Zr is taken as the inert core to describe the low-lying states of⁹²Nb, so that the 1f_5/2, 2p_3/2,2p_1/2proton orbitals and the 1f_5/2, 2p_3/2, 2p_1/2,1g_9/2neutron orbitals are fully occupied. The first six positive parity states of⁹²Nb (I^π=2⁺~7⁺) have been previously interpreted as the π(1g_9/2) $\otimes $ ν(2d_5/2) configuration, and the first two negative parity states of 2^-and 3^-are dominated by the π(2p_1/2) $\otimes $ ν(2d_5/2) configuration [11,13]. As⁹²Nb has one neutron more than⁹¹Nb, it should have similar level structure for low-excited states, as shown inFig. 7. Hence, the low-lying levels of⁹²Nb are described as⁹¹Nb $\otimes $ νd_5/2as shown inTable 3, where the negative parity statesI^π=7^-, 8^-, 9^-₍₁₎, 9^-₍₂₎, 10^-₍₁₎, 10^-₍₂₎are described as a proton excited from thep_1/2orbital to theg_9/2orbital, and the positive parity states 9⁺, 11⁺, 12⁺, 13⁺are described as a pair of protons excited from thep_1/2orbital to theg_9/2orbital. The calculation results for the one proton-neutron coupled configuration, πg_9/2 $ \otimes$ νd_5/2, and for the two proton-hole neutron-particle coupled configuration, πp_1/2^-1(g_9/2)² $\otimes $ νd_5/2and π(p_1/2)^-2(g_9/2)³ $\otimes $ νd_5/2, are listed inTable 3. As can be seen from this table, the shell model predictions for the low-excited states agree well with the experimental data, which confirms the assignments of Ref. [13] , where the first six positive parity statesI^π=2⁺~7⁺and the first two negative parity states 2^-and 3^-are πg_9/2 $\otimes$ νd_5/2and πp_1/2^-1(g_9/2)² $\otimes $ νd_5/2, respectively.

Figure 7.(color online) Comparison of the low-lying states of⁹¹Nb and⁹²Nb.

Iπ	configuration	Eexp/MeV	Ecal1/MeV
2+	πg9/2 $ \otimes$ νd5/2	0.136	0.326
3+		0.286	0.402
4+		0.480	0.495
5+		0.357	0.372
6+		0.501	0.515
7+		0	0
2−	π(p1/2)-1(g9/2)2 $ \otimes$ νd5/2	0.227	0.275
3−		0.391	0.314
7−		1.945	1.83
8−		2.116	2.028
9−(1)		2.088	1.900
9−(2)		2.213	2.54
10−(1)		2.235	2.203
10−(2)		2.6	2.643
9+	π(p1/2)-2(g9/2)3 $ \otimes$ νd5/2	2.287	2.552
11+		2.998	3.295
12+		3.797	3.859
13+		3.326	3.528
1the result of shell model calculation with pure configurations.

Table 3.Dominant configurations of the low-lying excited states of⁹²Nb proposed by the shell model calculations with a pure configuration and SNET interaction, calculated results and experimental level energies.

For the higher excited states of⁹²Nb,⁹⁰Zr is not an ideal core anymore, which makes the configuration of the high-excited states more complicated, as the pure configurations cannot describe the high-excited states properly. In order to study the high-excited states of⁹²Nb, a large-basis shell model calculation is necessary.

To obtain a more appropriate description of the observed high-excited states of⁹²Nb, large-basis shell model calculations are used.⁹²Nb has 13 valence protons and 23 valence neutrons outside the⁵⁶Ni core. Due to the large number of active orbitals, truncation of the model space is necessary. In the calculations of⁹²Nb, the valance space is restricted to π(1f_5/2^4-6, 2p_3/2^2-4, 2p_1/2^0-2, 1g_9/2^1-6, 1g_7/2^0-0, 2d_5/2^0-0, 2d_3/2^0-0, 3s_1/2^0-0) $ \otimes$ (1f_5/2^6-6, 2p_3/2^4-4, 2p_1/2^2-2, 1g_9/2^9-10, 1g_7/2^0-1, 2d_5/2^0-2, 2d_3/2^0-0, 3s_1/2^0-0, 1h_11/2^0-1). A comparison between the experimentally determined excitations and the large-basis shell model results is shown inTable 4.

Iπ	Eexp/MeV	Ecal2/MeV	configuration	partition(%)
9+	2.287	2.111	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	50.24
			4 4 2 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	13.84
11+	2.998	3.146	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	58.88
12+	3.797	3.746	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	64.89
13+	3.326	3.325	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	61.88
8−	2.116	2.320	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	38.79
			6 4 2 1 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	21.59
9−	2.088	2.232	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	30.85
			6 4 2 1 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	12.36
9−(2)	2.213	2.777	6 4 1 2 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	52.03
10−	2.235	1.863	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	41.57
10−(2)	2.6	2.841	6 4 1 2 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 1 0 0 0	49.4
13−	4.587	4.797	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	31.97
15−	4.941	5.207	6 4 0 3 $ \otimes$ 6 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 1	65.92
2the result of shell model calculation with mixed configurations.

Table 4.Main partition of the wave function for high-spin states of⁹²Nb. Each angular momentum is composed of several different partitions. Each partition is of the formp=π[p(1),p(2),p(3),p(4)] $ \otimes$ ν[n(1),n(2),n(3),n(4),n(5),n(6),n(7),n(8),n(9),n(10)], wherep(i) represents the number of valence protons in the 1f_5/2, 2p_3/2, 2p_1/2and 1g_9/2orbitals, andn(j) represents the number of valence neutrons in the 1f_5/2, 2p_3/2, 2p_1/2, 1g_9/2, 1g_7/2, 2d_5/22d_3/23s_1/21h_11/2orbitals, respectively. One neutron is excited to theg_7/2andh_11/2orbitals in these calculations.

Excited states of^92,93Nb were studied in the reactions induced by the weakly-bound nucleus⁶Li. The states of⁹²Nb were populated in the⁸⁹Y(⁶Li,p2n)⁹²Nb and⁸⁹Y(α,n)⁹²Nb reactions, and of⁹³Nb in the⁸⁹Y(⁶Li,pn)⁹³Nb reaction. A total of 20 new transitions, 8 new states of⁹²Nb and two transitions in⁹³Nb were observed and added to the level schemes of the two nuclei. The multipolarity of the states of^92,93Nb was analyzed following the ADO ratio. Shell model calculations were performed with the code NushellX to reconstruct the level structure of⁹²Nb, where SNE valence space and SNET interaction were used. For the low-excited states, a pure configuration with⁹⁰Zr as an inert core was employed. Large-basis shell model calculations were performed to study the higher excited states of⁹²Nb. The results agree well with the experimental data.

We are grateful to the INFN-LNL staff for providing stable⁶Li beam throughout the experiment. This research was also supported by the HIRFL User Project, CAS.