Pair production of Higgs boson in NMSSM at the LHC with the next-to-lightestCP-even Higgs boson being SM-like

  • The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM) more naturally accommodates a Higgs boson with a mass of approximately 125 GeV than the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). In this work, we assume that the next-to-lightest CP-even Higgs boson h 2is the SM-like Higgs boson h, whereas the lightest CP-even Higgs boson h 1is dominantly singlet-like. We discuss the h 1 h 1, h 2 h 2, and h 1 h 2pair production processes via gluon-gluon fusion at the LHC for an collision energy of 14 TeV, and we consider the cases in which one Higgs boson decays to bband the other decays to γγor τ + τ -. We find that, for m h1≲ 62 GeV, the cross section of the ggh 1 h 1process is relatively large and maximally reaches 5400 fb, and the production rate of the h 1 h 1bb τ + τ -final state can reach 1500 fb, which make the detection of this final state possible for future searches of an integrated luminosity of 300 and 3000 fb -1. This is mainly due to the contributions from the resonant production process pph 2h 1 h 1and the relatively large branching ratio of h 1bband h 1τ + τ -. The cross sections of the pph 2 h 2and pph 1 h 2production processes maximally reach 28 fb and 133 fb, respectively.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] G. Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 716: 1 (2012); S. Chatrchyan et al (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 716: 30 (2012)
    [2] G. Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(1):, 6 (2016) [arXiv:1507.04548 [hep-ex]]; V. Khachatryan et al (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(5): 212 (2015) [arXiv:1412.8662 [hep-ex]]; S. Chatrchyan et al (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(8): 081803 (2013) [arXiv:1212.6639 [hep-ex]]; G. Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 726: 120 (2013) [arXiv:1307.1432 [hepex]]
    [3] M. J. Dolan, C. Englert, and M. Spannowsky, Phys. Rev. D, 87(5): 055002 (2013) [arXiv:1210.8166 [hep-ph]]; S. Dawson, A. Ismail, and I. Low, Phys. Rev. D, 91(11): 115008 (2015) [arXiv:1504.05596 [hep-ph]]; H. J. He, J. Ren, and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. D, 93(1): 015003 (2016) [arXiv:1506.03302 [hepph]]; G. D. Kribs and A. Martin, Phys. Rev. D, 86: 095023 (2012) [arXiv:1207.4496 [hep-ph]]
    [4] M. Carena, Z. Liu, and M. Riembau, arXiv:1801.00794 [hepph]; J. H. Kim, Y. Sakaki, and M. Son, arXiv:1801.06093 [hepph]; L. Bian, N. Chen, and Y. Jiang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 32(34): 1746002 (2017) [arXiv:1712.01632 [hep-ph]]; J. Ren, R. Q. Xiao, M. Zhou, Y. Fang, H. J. He, and W. Yao, arXiv:1706.05980 [hep-ph]; I. M. Lewis and M. Sullivan, Phys. Rev. D, 96(3): 035037 (2017) [arXiv:1701.08774 [hepph]]; S. Dawson and M. Sullivan, arXiv:1711.06683 [hep-ph]; K. Nakamura, K. Nishiwaki, K. y. Oda, S. C. Park, and Y. Yamamoto, Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(5): 273 (2017) [arXiv:1701.06137 [hep-ph]]
    [5] C. Han, X. Ji, L. Wu, P. Wu, and J. M. Yang, JHEP, 1404:003 (2014) [arXiv:1307.3790 [hep-ph]]; X. F. Han, L. Wang, and J. M. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B, 825: 222 (2010) [arXiv:0908.1827 [hep-ph]]; X. F. Han, L. Wang, and J. M. Yang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 31(31): 1650178 (2016) [arXiv:1509.02453 [hep-ph]]; J. Cao, D. Li, L. Shang, P. Wu, and Y. Zhang, JHEP, 1412: 026 (2014) [arXiv:1409.8431 [hep-ph]]; Z. Heng, L. Shang, Y. Zhang, and J. Zhu, JHEP, 1402: 083 (2014) [arXiv:1312.4260 [hep-ph]]
    [6] U. Ellwanger, JHEP, 1308: 077 (2013) [arXiv:1306.5541 [hepph]]
    [7] J. Cao, Z. Heng, L. Shang, P. Wan, and J. M. Yang, JHEP, 1304: 134 (2013) [arXiv:1301.6437 [hep-ph]]
    [8] P. Huang, A. Joglekar, M. Li, and C. E. M. Wagner, arXiv:1711.05743 [hep-ph]
    [9] A. Djouadi, W. Kilian, M. Muhlleitner, and P. M. Zerwas, Eur. Phys. J. C, 10: 45 (1999) [hep-ph/9904287]
    [10] T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B, 479:46 (1996) Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B, 531: 655 (1998)] [hepph/9603205]; E. W. N. Glover and J. J. van der Bij, Nucl. Phys. B, 309: 282 (1988)
    [11] J. Baglio et al, JHEP, 1304: 151 (2013) [arXiv:1212.5581 [hepph]]; D. Y. Shao, C. S. Li, H. T. Li, and J. Wang, JHEP, 1307:169 (2013) [arXiv:1301.1245 [hep-ph]]
    [12] U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, Phys. Rept., 496: 1 (2010) [arXiv:0910.1785]
    [13] J. J. Cao, Z. X. Heng, J. M. Yang, Y. M. Zhang, and J. Y. Zhu, JHEP, 1203: 086 (2012) [arXiv:1202.5821 [hep-ph]]
    [14] Z. Kang, J. Li, and T. Li, JHEP, 1211: 024 (2012) [arXiv:1201.5305 [hep-ph]]
    [15] J. Cao, Y. He, L. Shang, W. Su, and Y. Zhang, JHEP, 1608: 037 (2016) [arXiv:1606.04416 [hep-ph]]; J. Cao, Y. He, L. Shang, W. Su, P. Wu, and Y. Zhang, JHEP, 1610: 136 (2016) [arXiv:1609.00204 [hep-ph]]
    [16] U. Baur, T. Plehn, and D. L. Rainwater, Phys. Rev. D, 69: 053004 (2004) [hep-ph/0310056]; A. Papaefstathiou, L. L. Yang and J. Zurita, Phys. Rev. D, 87(1): 011301 (2013) [arXiv:1209.1489 [hep-ph]]; T. Huang et al, Phys. Rev. D, 96(3): 035007 (2017) [arXiv:1701.04442 [hep-ph]]; A. Adhikary, S. Banerjee, R. K. Barman, B. Bhattacherjee, and S. Niyogi, arXiv:1712.05346 [hep-ph]
    [17] M. Maniatis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 25: 3505 (2010) [arXiv:0906.0777 [hep-ph]]
    [18] U. Ellwanger, J. F. Gunion, and C. Hugonie, JHEP, 0502: 066 (2005) [hep-ph/0406215]; U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Comput. Phys. Commun., 175: 290 (2006) [hep-ph/0508022]
    [19] P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C, 74(2) 2711 (2014) [arXiv:1305.1933 [hep-ph]]; JHEP, 1411: 039 (2014) [arXiv:1403.1582 [hep-ph]]; O. Stal and T. Stefaniak, PoS EPS, -HEP2013: 314 (2013) [arXiv:1310.4039 [hep-ph]]
    [20] P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, Comput. Phys. Commun., 181: 138 (2010) [arXiv:0811.4169 [hep-ph]]; Comput. Phys. Commun., 182:2605 (2011) [arXiv:1102.1898 [hep-ph]]
    [21] M. Papucci, K. Sakurai, A. Weiler, and L. Zeune, Eur. Phys. J. C, 74(11): 3163 (2014) [arXiv:1402.0492 [hep-ph]]
    [22] S. Kraml, S. Kulkarni, U. Laa, A. Lessa, W. Magerl, D. Proschofsky-Spindler, and W. Waltenberger, Eur. Phys. J. C, 74: 2868 (2014) [arXiv:1312.4175 [hep-ph]]
    [23] J. Alwall et al, JHEP, 1407: 079 (2014) [arXiv:1405.0301 [hepph]]; J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, JHEP, 1106: 128 (2011) [arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph]]
    [24] T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, JHEP, 0605: 026 (2006) [hep-ph/0603175]
    [25] J. de Favereau et al (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), JHEP, 1402:057 (2014) [arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]]
    [26] D. Dercks, N. Desai, J. S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, J. Tattersall, and T. Weber, Comput. Phys. Commun., 221: 383 (2017) [arXiv:1611.09856 [hep-ph]]; J. S. Kim, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall, and K. Rolbiecki, Comput. Phys. Commun., 196:535 (2015) [arXiv:1503.01123 [hep-ph]]; M. Drees, H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall, and J. S. Kim, Comput. Phys. Commun., 187: 227 (2015) [arXiv:1312.2591 [hep-ph]]
    [27] C. Patrignani et al (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C, 40(10): 100001 (2016)
    [28] A. Belyaev, M. Drees, O. J. P. Eboli, J. K. Mizukoshi, and S. F. Novaes, Phys. Rev. D, 60: 075008 (1999) [hepph/9905266]
    [29] M. Aaboud et al (ATLAS Collaboration), JHEP, 1801: 055 (2018) [arXiv:1709.07242 [hep-ex]]
    [30] CMS Collaboration, CMS PAS HIG-17-020
    [31] M. Aaboud et al (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:1804.06174 [hep-ex]
    [32] A. M. Sirunyan et al (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 778:101 (2018) [arXiv:1707.02909 [hep-ex]]
    [33] CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-HIG-17-008
  • 加载中

Get Citation
Zhaoxia Heng, Xue Gong and Haijing Zhou. Pair production of Higgs boson in NMSSM at the LHC with the next-to-lightest CP-even Higgs boson being SM-like[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(7): 073103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/7/073103
Zhaoxia Heng, Xue Gong and Haijing Zhou. Pair production of Higgs boson in NMSSM at the LHC with the next-to-lightest CP-even Higgs boson being SM-like[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(7): 073103. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/7/073103 shu
Milestone
Received: 2018-04-06
Fund

    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11705048)

Article Metric

Article Views(3759)
PDF Downloads(16)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Email This Article

    Title:
    Email:

    Pair production of Higgs boson in NMSSM at the LHC with the next-to-lightestCP-even Higgs boson being SM-like

    • 1. College of Physics and Materials Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
    Fund Project:Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11705048)

      Abstract:The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM) more naturally accommodates a Higgs boson with a mass of approximately 125 GeV than the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). In this work, we assume that the next-to-lightestCP-even Higgs bosonh2is the SM-like Higgs bosonh, whereas the lightestCP-even Higgs bosonh1is dominantly singlet-like. We discuss theh1h1,h2h2, andh1h2pair production processes via gluon-gluon fusion at the LHC for an collision energy of 14 TeV, and we consider the cases in which one Higgs boson decays tobband the other decays toγγorτ+τ-. We find that, formh1≲ 62 GeV, the cross section of theggh1h1process is relatively large and maximally reaches 5400 fb, and the production rate of theh1h1bbτ+τ-final state can reach 1500 fb, which make the detection of this final state possible for future searches of an integrated luminosity of 300 and 3000 fb-1. This is mainly due to the contributions from the resonant production processpph2h1h1and the relatively large branching ratio ofh1bbandh1τ+τ-. The cross sections of thepph2h2andpph1h2production processes maximally reach 28 fb and 133 fb, respectively.

        HTML

      Reference (33)

      目录

      /

        Return
        Return
          Baidu
          map