Chinese Physics C > 2017, Vol. 41 > Issue(4): 044101 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/044101

Simulation of the fission dynamics of the excited compound nuclei²⁰⁶Po and¹⁶⁸Yb produced in the reactions¹²C+¹⁹⁴Pt and¹⁸O+¹⁵⁰Sm

H. Eslamizadeh^,,
F. Bagheri

1.
Department of Physics, Persian Gulf University 7516913817, Bushehr, Iran

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
A two-dimensional dynamical model based on the Langevin equation was used to study the fission dynamics of the compound nuclei ²⁰⁶Po and ¹⁶⁸Yb produced in the reactions ¹²C+ ¹⁹⁴Pt and ¹⁸O+ ¹⁵⁰Sm, respectively. The fission cross section and average pre-scission neutron multiplicity were calculated for the compound nuclei ²⁰⁶Po and ¹⁶⁸Yb, and results of the calculations compared with the experimental data. The elongation coordinate was used as the first dimension and the projection of the total spin of the compound nucleus onto the symmetry axis, K, considered as the second dimension in the Langevin dynamical calculations. In the two-dimensional calculations, a constant dissipation coefficient of Kand a non-constant dissipation coefficient have been used to reproduce the above-mentioned experimental data. It is shown that the two-dimensional Langevin equation can satisfactorily reproduce the fission cross section and average pre-scission neutron multiplicity for the compound nuclei ²⁰⁶Po and ¹⁶⁸Yb by using constant values of the dissipation coefficient of Kequal to γK=0.18(MeV zs) ^-1/2and γK=0.20(MeV zs) ^-1/2for the compound nuclei ²⁰⁶Po and ¹⁶⁸Yb, respectively.
- dissipation coefficient,
- Langevin model,
- fission cross section

References

[1]	E. G. Ryabov, A. V. Karpov, P. N. Nadtochy and G. D. Adeev, Phys. Rev. C, 78:044614 (2008)
[2]	P. N. Nadtochy, E. G. Ryabov, A. E. Gegechkori, Yu. A. Anischenko and G. D. Adeev, Phys. Rev. C, 89:014616 (2014)
[3]	H. Eslamizadeh, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 40:095102 (2013)
[4]	N. Vonta, G. A. Souliotis, M. Veselsky and A. Bonaser. Phys. Rev. C, 92:024616 (2015)
[5]	I. I. Gontchar et al, Phys. At. Nucl., 63:1688 (2000)
[6]	H. Eslamizadeh, Chinese Phys. C, 39:054102 (2015)
[7]	I. I. Gontchar, P. Frbrich and N. I. Pischasov, Phys. Rev. C, 47:2228 (1993)
[8]	H. Eslamizadeh, Pramana J. Phys., 80:621 (2013)
[9]	A. V. Karpov, R. M. Hiryanov, A. V. Sagdeev, G. D. Adeev, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 34:255 (2007)
[10]	J. P. Lestone and S. G. McCalla, Phys. Rev. C, 79:044611 (2009)
[11]	H. Eslamizadeh and M. Soltani, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 80:261 (2015)
[12]	M. V. Borunov, P. N. Nadtochy, G. D. Adeev, Nucl. Phys. A, 799:56 (2008)
[13]	J. P. Lestone et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 559:277 (1993)
[14]	H. Eslamizadeh, Pramana J. Phys., 78:231 (2012)
[15]	H. Eslamizadeh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 21:1250008 (2012)
[16]	W. Ye, N. Wang and J. Tian, Phys. Rev. C, 90:041604 (2014)
[17]	Yu. A. Anischenko, A. E. Gegechkori and G. D. Adeev, Yad. Fiz., 74:361 (2011)
[18]	W. Ye and J. Tian, Phys. Rev. C, 93:044603 (2016)
[19]	H. Eslamizadeh and H. Raanaei, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 51:252 (2013)
[20]	H. Eslamizadeh, Chinese Phys. C, 34:1714 (2010)
[21]	J. Tian, N. Wang and W. Ye, Chinese Phys. C, 39:034102 (2015)
[22]	W. Ye, J. Tian, Phys. Rev. C, 91:064603 (2015)
[23]	J. P. Lestone, Phys. Rev. C, 59:1540 (1999)
[24]	M. Brack et al, Rev. Mod. Phys., 44:320 (1972)
[25]	T. Wada, Y. Abe and N. Carjan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:3538 (1993)
[26]	P. Frbrich, Nucl. Phys. A, 787:170 (2007)
[27]	A. V. Ignatyuk et al, Yad. Fiz., 21:1185 (1975)
[28]	H. J. Krappe, J. R. Nix and J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C, 20:992 (1979)
[29]	A. J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C, 33:2039 (1986)
[30]	W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys., 81:1 (1966)
[31]	W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Ark. Fys., 36:343 (1967)
[32]	G. Chaudhuri and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C, 63:064603 (2001)
[33]	S. Pal and T. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. C, 57:210 (1998)
[34]	J. Blocki, F. Brut, T. Srokowski and W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A, 545:511 (1992)
[35]	P. Frbrich and I. I. Gontchar, Phys. Rep., 292:131 (1998)
[36]	S. G. McCalla and J. P. Lestone, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:032702 (2008)
[37]	T. Dssing and J. Randrup, Nucl. Phys. A, 433:215 (1985)
[38]	J. Randrup, Nucl. Phys. A, 383:468 (1982)
[39]	K. T. R. Davies, J. R. Nix, Phys. Rev. C, 14:1977 (1976)
[40]	M. Blann, Phys. Rev. C, 21:1770 (1980)
[41]	J. E. Lynn, The theory of neutron resonance reactions (Clarendon:Oxford, 1968) p. 325
[42]	R. J. Charity et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 457:441 (1986)
[43]	D. Mancusi, R. J. Charity, and J. Cugnon, Phys. Rev. C, 82:044610 (2010)
[44]	J. van der Plicht et al, Phys. Rev. C, 28:2022 (1983)
[45]	D. J. Hinde et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 452:550 (1986)
[46]	K. S. Golda et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 913:157 (2013)

[1]	Zhen-Xing Chen,Ying Yang,Man-Qi Ruan,Da-Yong Wang,Gang Li,Shan Jin,Yong Ban. Cross section and Higgs mass measurement with Higgsstrahlung at the CEPC. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 023003.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/023003
[2]	D. Naderi,M. Salimi. Investigation of fission fragments average spin based on four dimensional Langevin dynamical model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 024104.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/024104
[3]	Jun-Long Tian,Hai-Tao Cui,Teng Gao,Ning Wang. Effect of Wigner energy on the symmetry energy coefficient in nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(9): 094101.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/9/094101
[4]	H. Eslamizadeh. Two-dimensional Langevin modeling of fission dynamics of the excited compound nuclei¹⁸⁸Pt,²²⁷Pa and²⁵¹Es. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(2): 024103.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/2/024103
[5]	Qiang Zhao,Zhi-Yong He,Lei Yang,Xue-Ying Zhang,Wen-Juan Cui,Zhi-Qiang Chen,Hu-Shan Xu. Monitoring method for neutron flux for a spallation target in an accelerator driven sub-critical system. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(7): 076203.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/076203
[6]	Jian Tian,Wei Ye. Effect of pre-equilibrium emission on probing postsaddle nuclear dissipation with neutrons. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(9): 094103.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/9/094103
[7]	TIAN Jian,WANG Ning,YE Wei. Langevin analysis of fission excitation functions induced by protons. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(3): 034102.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/3/034102
[8]	SUN Qian,SHANGGUAN Dan-Hua,BAO Jing-Dong. A dumbbell model with five parameters describing nuclear fusion or fission. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(1): 014102.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/37/1/014102
[9]	YANG Lin-Meng,GUO Wen-Jun,ZHANG Fan,NI Sheng. Study of the total reaction cross section via QMD. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(10): 104101.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/37/10/104101
[10]	ZHANG Jun-Jie,HU Bi-Tao. Cross section of reaction¹⁸¹Ta(p,nγ)¹⁸¹W and the influence of the spin cut-off parameter on the cross section. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(12): 1100-1104.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/35/12/004
[11]	WANG Bo-Qun,MO Xiao-Hu,WANG Ping,BAN Yong. Fast computation of observed cross section for ψ'→PP decays. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(5): 411-418.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/35/5/001
[12]	DUAN Chun-Gui,LIU Na,MIAO Wen-Dan. The dependence of J/ψ-nucleon inelastic cross section on the Feynman variable. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(9): 804-807.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/35/9/002
[13]	Zafar Yasin,Warda Iram,Muhammad Asghar,Ikram Shahzad. Cascade-exciton model analysis of level density parameter dependence in proton induced fission cross sections of some sub-actinide nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(11): 1013-1016.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/35/11/006
[14]	DONG Jian-Min,ZHANG Hong-Fei,ZUO Wei,LI Jun-Qing. Unified fission model for proton emission. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(2): 182-185.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/2/005
[15]	TIAN Jun-Long,LI Xian,WU Xi-Zhen,LI Zhu-Xia,YAN Shi-Wei. Understanding of the dissipation mechanism in ternary fission for the system¹⁹⁷Au+¹⁹⁷Au. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 109-112.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/035
[16]	WANG Kun,MA Yu-Gang,ZHENG Qing-Shan,CAI Xiang-Zhou,FANG De-Qing,FU Yao,LU Guang-Cheng,TIAN Wen-Dong,WANG Hong-Wei. Temperature dependent fission fragment distribution in the Langevin equation. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 119-122.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/038
[17]	YE Wei,WU Feng. Influence of angular momentum on evaporation residue cross section as a probe of nuclear dissipation. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(6): 433-436.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/32/6/004
[18]	MING ZhaoYu,ZHANG FengShou,CHEN LieWen,ZHU ZhiYuan,ZHAN WenLong,GUO ZhongYan,XIAO GuoQing. Isospin Dependent Boltzmann-Langevin Equation and the Production Cross Section of¹⁹Na. Chinese Physics C, 2000, 24(7): 656-661.
[19]	Mao Guangjun,Zhao Enguang,Li Zhuxia,Zhuo Yizhong. In-medium △ Absorption Cross Section. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(S4): 387-390.
[20]	BAO Jing-Dong,ZHU Yi-Zhong. CALCULATION OF THE KINETIC-ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS OF FISSION-FRAGMENTS FROM MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION TO THE FOUR-DIMENSIONAL LANGEVIN EQUATION. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(11): 1023-1031.

Access

Get Citation

H. Eslamizadeh and F. Bagheri. Simulation of the fission dynamics of the excited compound nuclei ²⁰⁶Po and ¹⁶⁸Yb produced in the reactions ¹²C+ ¹⁹⁴Pt and ¹⁸O+ ¹⁵⁰Sm[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(4): 044101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/044101

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2016-07-16

Article Metric

Article Views(3069)
PDF Downloads(30)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Simulation of the fission dynamics of the excited compound nuclei²⁰⁶Po and¹⁶⁸Yb produced in the reactions¹²C+¹⁹⁴Pt and¹⁸O+¹⁵⁰Sm

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article