Dynamical study of light scalar mesons below 1 GeV in a flux-tube model

  • The light scalar mesons below 1 GeV configured as tetraquark systems are studied in the framework of the flux-tube model. Comparative studies indicate that a multi-body confinement, instead of the additive two-body confinement, should be used in a multiquark system. The σ and κ mesons could be well accommodated in the diquark-antidiquark tetraquark picture, and could be colour-confinement resonances. The m a 0(980) and m f 0(980) mesons are not described as m K Kmolecular states and ns n sdiquark-antidiquark states. However, the mass of the first radial excited state of the diquark-antidiquark state, nn n nis 1019 MeV, is close to the experimental data of the m f 0(980).
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] Ablikim M et al. (BES collaboration). Phys. Lett. B, 2011, 698: 183-190[2] Ablikim M et al. (BES collaboration). Phys. Lett. B, 2006, 633: 681-690[3] Jaffe R L. Phys. Rep., 2005, 409: 1-45[4] Amsler C, Trnqvist N A. Phys. Rep., 2004, 389: 61-118[5] Jaffe R L. Phys. Rev. D, 1977, 15: 267-280[6] Jaffe R L. Phys. Rev. D, 1977, 15: 281-289[7] Alford M G, Jaffe R L. Nucl. Phys. B, 2000, 578: 367-382[8] Maiani L, Piccinini F, Polosa A D, Riquer V. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 93: 212002: 1-4[9] Pelaez J R. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 92: 102001: 1-4[10] Pelaez J R, Rios G. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 97: 242002: 1-4[11] Hooft G.'t, Isidori G, Maiani L, Polosa A D, Riquer V. Phys. Lett. B, 2008, 662: 424-430[12] Weinstein J, Isgur N. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1982, 48: 659-662[13] Giacosa F, Gutsche T, Lyubovitskij V E. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 77: 034007: 1-6[14] Branz T, Gutsche T, Lyubovitskij V E. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2008, 37: 303-317[15] Branz T, Gutsche T, Lyubovitskij V E. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 78: 114004: 1-10[16] Janssen G, Pearce B C, Holinde K, Speth J. Phys. Rev. D, 1995, 52: 2690-2700[17] Kaminski R, Lesniak L, Maillet J P. Phys. Rev. D, 1994, 50: 3145-3157[18] Oller J A, Oset E. Nucl. Phys. A, 1997, 620: 438-456[19] Oller J A, Oset E. Phys. Rev. D, 1999, 60: 074023: 1-22[20] Van Beveren E, Rupp G. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2001, 22: 493-501[21] Celenza L S, GAO S F, HUANG B, WANG H, Shakin C M. Phys. Rev. C, 2000, 61: 035201: 1-17[22] Umekawa T, Naito K, Oka M, Takizawa M. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 055205: 1-9[23] DAI Y B, WU Y L. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2005, 39: S1-S8[24] Bhavyashri, Vijaya Kumar K B, MA Y L, Prakash A. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 2009, 24: 4209-4220[25] Vijande J, Valcarce A, Fernandez F, Silvestre-Brac B. Phys. Rev. D, 2005, 72: 034025: 1-8[26] Napsuciale M, Rodríguez S. Phys. Lett. B, 2004, 603: 195-2002[27] Dmitrasinovic V. Phys. Rev. D, 2003, 67: 114007: 1-12[28] Pepin S, Stancu F. Phys. Rev. D, 2002, 65: 054032: 1-10[29] DENG C R, PING J L, WANG F, Goldman T. Phys. Rev. D, 2010, 82: 074001: 1-8[30] PING J L, DENG C R, WANG F, Goldman T. Phys. Lett. B, 2008, 659: 607-611[31] Hiyama E, Kino Y, Kamimura M. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 2003, 51: 223-307[32] WANG F, WONG C W. Nuovo Cimento A, 1985, 86: 283-289[33] Oka M, Horowitz C J. Phys. Rev. D, 1985, 31: 2773-2779[34] Oka M. Phys. Rev. D, 1985, 31: 2274-2287[35] Alexandrou C, de Forcrand P, Tsapalis A. Phys. Rev. D, 2002, 65: 054503: 1-7[36] Takahashi T T, Suganuma H, Nemoto Y, Matsufuru H. Phys. Rev. D, 2002, 65: 114509: 1-19[37] Okiharu F, Suganuma H, Takahashi T T. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 94: 192001: 1-4[38] Maiani L, Piccinini F, Polosa A D, Riquer V. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 93: 212002: 1-4[39] Black D, Fariborz A, Schechter J. Phys. Rev. D, 2000, 61: 074001: 1-10[40] Jaffe R L, Wilczek F. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, 91: 232003: 1-4[41] Johnson K, Thorn C B. Phys. Rev. D, 1976, 13: 1934-1919[42] Semay C. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2004, 22: 353-354[43] Bali G S. Phys. Rev. D, 2000, 62: 114503: 1-11[44] Carlson J, Pandharipande V R. Phys. Rev. D, 1991, 43: 1652-1658[45] Iwasaki M, Fukutome T. Phys. Rev. D, 2005, 72: 094016: 1-5[46] Bhaduri R K, Cohler L E, Nogami Y. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1980, 44: 1369-1372[47] Vijande J, Fernandez F, Valcarce A. J. Phys. G, 2005, 31: 481[48] Nakamura K et al. (Particle Data Group). J. Phys. G, 2010, 37: 075021[49] Isgur N. in The New Aspects of Subnuclear Physics. Edited Zichichi A. New York: Plenum, 1980. 107[50] ZOU F Y, CHEN X L, DENG W Z. Chin. Phys. C (HEP NP), 2008, 32: 515-520[51] Prelovsek S, Draper T, LANG C B et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2010, 82: 094507: 1-18[52] WANG F, PING J L, PANG H R, CHEN L Z. Nucl. Phys. A, 2007, 790: 493c-497c[53] Peláez J R. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 92: 102001
  • 加载中

Get Citation
DENG Cheng-Rong, PING Jia-Lun, ZHOU Ping and WANG Fan. Dynamical study of light scalar mesons below 1 GeV in a flux-tube model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(3): 033101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/033101
DENG Cheng-Rong, PING Jia-Lun, ZHOU Ping and WANG Fan. Dynamical study of light scalar mesons below 1 GeV in a flux-tube model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(3): 033101. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/033101 shu
Milestone
Received: 2012-03-31
Revised: 2012-10-13
Article Metric

Article Views(3877)
PDF Downloads(296)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Email This Article

    Title:
    Email:

    Dynamical study of light scalar mesons below 1 GeV in a flux-tube model

      Corresponding author:PING Jia-Lun,

      Abstract:The light scalar mesons below 1 GeV configured as tetraquark systems are studied in the framework of the flux-tube model. Comparative studies indicate that a multi-body confinement, instead of the additive two-body confinement, should be used in a multiquark system. The σ and κ mesons could be well accommodated in the diquark-antidiquark tetraquark picture, and could be colour-confinement resonances. The m a0(980) and m f0(980) mesons are not described as m KKmolecular states and nsnsdiquark-antidiquark states. However, the mass of the first radial excited state of the diquark-antidiquark state, nnnnis 1019 MeV, is close to the experimental data of the m f0(980).

        HTML

      Reference (1)

      目录

      /

        Return
        Return
          Baidu
          map