Expected ${\boldsymbol H \xrightarrow{} {\boldsymbol{\mu^+\mu^-}}} $ measurement precision with ${\boldsymbol { e^{+}e^{-}}{\bf \xrightarrow{}}{ \boldsymbol{Z(q\bar{q})H}}}$ production at the CEPC

  • A search for the dimuon decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson is performed using Monte Carlo simulated events to mimic data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.6 ab $ ^{-1} $ collected with the Circular Electron-Positron Collider detector in $ e^{+}e^{-} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=240 $ GeV. This study investigates the $ e^{+}e^{-}\to ZH,\, $ $ Z\to q\bar{q},\,H\to {{\mu^+\mu^-}} $ process, and the expected significance considering only the statistical uncertainty in the data for a background-only hypothesis for a Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV is found to be 6.1 $ \sigma $ , corresponding to a precision of 19%. The systematic impacts from the background Monte Carlo statistical fluctuations are estimated to be negligible. Moreover, the dependence of the measurement accuracy on the muon momentum resolution of the CEPC detector is investigated. It is found that the muon momentum resolution must be better than 204 MeV to discover the $ H\to\mu\mu $ process at the nominal integrated luminosity. If the resolution is 100% worse than the designed parameter, the integrated luminosity must be greater than 7.2 ab $ ^{-1} $ to reach 5 $ \sigma $ significance.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys.22, 579 (1961), ISSN 0029-5582
    [2] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1264 (1967) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264
    [3] F. Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 321 (1964) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321
    [4] P. W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 508 (1964)
    [5] G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 585 (1964) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585
    [6] G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbottet al., Phys. Lett. B716, 1-29 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020
    [7] S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. Sirunyanet al., Phys. Lett. B716, 30-61 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021
    [8] G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallahet al., Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 45 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)045
    [9] The ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B784, 173 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.035
    [10] A. M. Sirunyanet al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 121801 (2018), arXiv: 1808.08242
    [11] The ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B812, 135980 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135980
    [12] A. M. Cms Collaboration, Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, T. Bergauer, M. Dragicevic, and J. Erö, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 148 (2021)
    [13] Tech. Rep., CERN, Geneva (2018),https://cds.cern.ch/record/2652762.
    [14] S.-i. Kawada, J. List, and M. Berggren, The European Physical Journal C80, (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08729-7
    [15] M. Mangano, P. Azzi, M. Benediktet al., Tech. Rep., CERN, Geneva (2018),https://cds.cern.ch/record/2651294.
    [16] M. Ahmadet al.,CEPC-SPPC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report. 1. Physics and Detector(2015)
    [17] Z.-W. Cui, Q. Li, G. Liet al., Chin. Phys. C42, 053001 (2018) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/5/053001
    [18] F. An, Y. Bai, C. Chenet al., Chin. Phys. C43, 043002 (2019) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/43/4/043002
    [19] M. Donget al. (CEPC Study Group) (2018), arXiv: 1811.10545
    [20] G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Grosset al., The European Physical Journal C71, 1554 (2011) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0
    [21] D. S. Group (2019), arXiv: 1901.03170
    [22] P. Mora de Freitas and H. Videau,Detector simulation with MOKKA / GEANT4: Present and future, 623-627 (2002)
    [23] W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1742 (2011), arXiv: 0708.4233
    [24] X. Mo, G. Li, M.-Q. Ruanet al., Chin. Phys. C40, 033001 (2016) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/033001
    [25] T. Sjöstrand, L. Lönnblad, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,Pythia 6.3 physics and manual(2003), arXiv: hep-ph/0308153.
    [26] T. Taylor and D. Treille, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.27, 217 (2017) doi:10.1142/9789814749145_0007
    [27] M. Ruan, Arbor,a new approach of the particle flow algorithm(2014), arXiv: 1403.4784
    [28] M. Ruan, H. Zhao, G. Liet al., The European Physical Journal C78, 426 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5876-z
    [29] D. Yu, M. Ruan, V. Boudryet al., The European Physical Journal C77, 591 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5146-5
    [30] S. Catani, Y. Dokshitzer, M. Olssonet al., Phys. Lett. B269, 432 (1991) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90196-W
  • 加载中

Figures(8)/Tables(3)

Get Citation
Qi Liu, Kunlin Ran, Yanping Huang, Gang Li, Manqi Ruan, Shan Jin and Liang Sun. Expected ${\boldsymbol H \xrightarrow{} {\boldsymbol{\mu^+\mu^-}}} $ measurement precision with ${\boldsymbol { e^{+}e^{-}}}{\bf \xrightarrow{}}{ \boldsymbol{Z(q\bar{q})H}}$ production at the CEPC[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac74a9
Qi Liu, Kunlin Ran, Yanping Huang, Gang Li, Manqi Ruan, Shan Jin and Liang Sun. Expected ${\boldsymbol H \xrightarrow{} {\boldsymbol{\mu^+\mu^-}}} $ measurement precision with ${\boldsymbol { e^{+}e^{-}}}{\bf \xrightarrow{}}{ \boldsymbol{Z(q\bar{q})H}}$ production at the CEPC[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac74a9 shu
Milestone
Received: 2021-12-16
Article Metric
Baidu
map