Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2023 Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2022 2021 Impact Factor 2.944
Advanced Search
Chinese Physics C > 2022, Vol. 46 > Issue(9): 093108 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7200

Final bound-state formation effect on dark matter annihilation

  • School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China

  • If two annihilation products of dark matter (DM) particles are non-relativistic and couple to a light force mediator, their plane wave functions are modified due to multiple exchanges of the force mediator. This gives rise to the final state Sommerfeld (FSS) effect. It is also possible that the final state particles form a bound state. Both the FSS effect and final bound-state (FBS) effect need to be considered in the calculation of the DM relic abundance. The annihilation products can be non-relativistic if their masses are comparable to those of the annihilating DM particles. We study the FSS and FBS effects in the mass-degenerate region using two specific models. Both models serve to illustrate different partial-wave contributions in the calculations of the FSS and FBS effects. We find that the FBS effect can be comparable to the FSS effect when the annihilation products couple strongly with a light force mediator. Those effects significantly modify the DM relic abundance.
  • 加载中

  • References

    [1] N. Aghanimet al., Astron. Astrophys.,641, A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)]
    [2] Gerard Jungman, Marc Kamionkowski, and Kim Griest, Phys. Rept.267, 195-373 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5
    [3] Benjamin W. Lee and Steven Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 165-168 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.165
    [4] Edward W. Kolb and Michael S. Turner.The Early Universe, volume 69. 1990
    [5] Kalliopi Petraki, Marieke Postma, and Michael Wiechers, JHEP06, 128 (2015)
    [6] A. Sommerfeld., Annalen der Physik403(3), 257-330 (1931) doi:10.1002/andp.19314030302
    [7] Jonathan L. Feng, Manoj Kaplinghat, Huitzu Tuet al., JCAP07, 004 (2009)
    [8] Benedict von Harling and Kalliopi Petraki, JCAP12, 033 (2014)
    [9] John Ellis, Feng Luo, and Keith A, JHEP09, 127 (2015)
    [10] Seng Pei Liew and Feng Luo, JHEP02, 091 (2017)
    [11] Julia Harz and Kalliopi Petraki, JHEP04, 130 (2019)
    [12] Julia Harz and Kalliopi Petraki, JHEP07, 096 (2018)
    [13] Hajime Fukuda, Feng Luo, and Satoshi Shirai, JHEP04, 107 (2019)
    [14] Juri Smirnov and John F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D100(4), 043029 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043029
    [15] Mathias Becker, Emanuele Copello, Julia Harzet al.,Impact of Sommerfeld Effect and Bound State Formation in Simplifiedt-Channel Dark Matter Models. 3 2022
    [16] S. Biondini and Stefan Vogl, JHEP02, 016 (2019)
    [17] S. Biondini, JHEP06, 104 (2018)
    [18] Simone Biondini and Vladyslav Shtabovenko, JHEP03, 172 (2022)
    [19] Raffaele Tito D'Agnolo and Joshua T. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(6), 061301 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.061301
    [20] Joachim Kopp, Jia Liu, Tracy R. Slatyeret al., JHEP12, 033 (2016)
    [21] Xiaoyi Cui and Feng Luo, JHEP01, 156 (2021)
    [22] J. W. Moffat, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1605-1606 (1975) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1605
    [23] Yibiao Chen and Pengfei Zhuang,Dimuonium \begin{document}$(\mu^+\mu^-)$\end{document} Production in a Quark-Gluon Plasma. 4 2012
    [24] Paul Hoyer,Bound states – from QED to QCD. 2 2014
    [25] Alexander Kusenko and Paul J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 141301 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.141301
    [26] Alexander Kusenko, Lee Loveridge, and Mikhail Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. D72, 025015 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.025015
    [27] Iason Baldes, Francesca Calore, Kalliopi Petrakiet al., SciPost Phys.9(5), 068 (2020) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.5.068
    [28] David Curtin, Rouven Essig, Stefania Goriet al., JHEP02, 157 (2015)
    [29] Savely G. Karshenboim, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19, 3879-3896 (2004) doi:10.1142/S0217751X04020142
    [30] Xabier Cid Vidal, Philip Ilten, Jonathan Plewset al., Phys. Rev. D100(5), 053003 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.053003
    [31] Jonathan L. Feng, Manoj Kaplinghat, and Hai-Bo Yu, Phys. Rev. D82, 083525 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083525
    [32] Tracy R. Slatyer, Les Houches Lectures on Indirect Detection of Dark Matter. InLes Houches summer school on Dark Matter, 9 2021
    [33] N. Fabiano, Eur. Phys. Journal C2(2), 345-350 (1998) doi:10.1007/s100520050144
    [34] Kim Griest and David Seckel, Phys. Rev. D43, 3191-3203 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3191
    [35] P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Nucl. Phys. B360(1), 145-179 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90438-4
    [36] Marco Cirelli, Alessandro Strumia, and Matteo Tamburini, Nucl. Phys. B787, 152-175 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.07.023
    [37] David J. Gross, Robert D. Pisarski, and Laurence G. Yaffe, Rev. Mod. Phys.53, 43-80 (1981) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.53.43
    [38] Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder.An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995.
    [39] Pouya Asadi, Matthew Baumgart, Patrick J. Fitzpatricket al., JCAP02, 005 (2017)
    [40] Abhijit Sen and Zurab K. Silagadze, Can. J. Phys.97(7), 693-700 (2019) doi:10.1139/cjp-2018-0500
    [41] Kalliopi Petraki, Marieke Postma, and Jordy de Vries, JHEP04, 077 (2017)
    [42] Masahiro Ibe, Hitoshi Murayama, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D79, 095009 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.095009
    [43] Wan-Lei Guo and Yue-Liang Wu, Phys. Rev. D79, 055012 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.055012
    [44] Roberto Iengo, JHEP05, 024 (2009)
    [45] S. Cassel, J. Phys. G37, 105009 (2010) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/10/105009

  • Access

    加载中

Figures(13)/Tables(2)

Get Citation
Xinyu Wang, Fucheng Zhong and Feng Luo. Final bound-state formation effect on dark matter annihilation[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7200
Xinyu Wang, Fucheng Zhong and Feng Luo. Final bound-state formation effect on dark matter annihilation[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac7200 shu
Milestone
Received: 2022-04-03
Article Metric

Article Views(3472)
PDF Downloads(32)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Email This Article

    Title:
    Email:

    Final bound-state formation effect on dark matter annihilation

    • School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
    • Received Date:2022-04-03
    • Available Online:2022-09-15

      Abstract:If two annihilation products of dark matter (DM) particles are non-relativistic and couple to a light force mediator, their plane wave functions are modified due to multiple exchanges of the force mediator. This gives rise to the final state Sommerfeld (FSS) effect. It is also possible that the final state particles form a bound state. Both the FSS effect and final bound-state (FBS) effect need to be considered in the calculation of the DM relic abundance. The annihilation products can be non-relativistic if their masses are comparable to those of the annihilating DM particles. We study the FSS and FBS effects in the mass-degenerate region using two specific models. Both models serve to illustrate different partial-wave contributions in the calculations of the FSS and FBS effects. We find that the FBS effect can be comparable to the FSS effect when the annihilation products couple strongly with a light force mediator. Those effects significantly modify the DM relic abundance.

        HTML

        I. INTRODUCTION

        • The standard cosmological model (ΛCDM) successfully describes the large scale structure evolution of our universe. The main matter component in the ΛCDM, called

      Baidu
      map