Gravitational leptogenesis in teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravities

  • In this study, we investigate the possibilities of generating baryon number asymmetry under thermal equilibrium within the frameworks of teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravities. Through the derivative couplings of the torsion scalar and the non-metricity scalar to baryons, baryon number asymmetry is produced in the radiation dominated epoch. For gravitational baryogenesis mechanisms in these two frameworks, the produced baryon-to-entropy ratio is too small to be consistent with observations. However, the gravitational leptogenesis models within both frameworks have the potential to explain the observed baryon-antibaryon asymmetry.
  • 加载中
  • [1] N. Aghanimet al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020) [Erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)]
    [2] P. A. Zylaet al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP2020(8), 083C01 (2020) doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104
    [3] A. D. Sakharov, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32-35 (1967) doi:10.1070/PU1991v034n05ABEH002497
    [4] A. G. Cohen and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B199, 251-258 (1987) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91369-4
    [5] M. z. Li, X. l. Wang, B. Fenget al., Phys. Rev. D65, 103511 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0112069[hep-ph doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.103511
    [6] M. Li and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B573, 20-26 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0209093[hep-ph doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.08.041
    [7] A. De Felice, S. Nasri, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D67, 043509 (2003), arXiv:hepph/0207211[hep-ph doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.043509
    [8] E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, Front. Phys.69, 1-547 (1990)
    [9] H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, G. D. Kribset al., Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 201301 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403019[hep-ph doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.201301
    [10] T. Shiromizu and K. Koyama, JCAP07, 011 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403231[hep-ph doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/011
    [11] H. Li, M. z. Li, and X. m. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D70, 047302 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403281[hep-ph doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.047302
    [12] R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, Teleparallel Gravity, Vol. 173. Springer, 23 Dordrecht, (2013)
    [13] J. M. Nester and H. J. Yo, Chin. J. Phys.37, 113 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9809049[gr-qc
    [14] V. K. Oikonomou and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D94(12), 124005 (2016), arXiv:1607.08561[gr-qc doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124005
    [15] S. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Dark Univ.30, 100612 (2020), arXiv:2005.05534[gr-qc doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100612
    [16] N. Azhar, A. Jawad, and S. Rani, Phys. Dark Univ.30, 100724 (2020), arXiv:2009.13293[gr-qc doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100724
    [17] S. H. S. Alexander, M. E. Peskin, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 081301 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0403069[hep-th doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.081301
    [18] S. Bahamonde, K. F. Dialektopoulos, C. Escamilla-Riveraet al., arXiv: 2106.13793[gr-qc]
    [19] M. Li, H. Rao, and D. Zhao, JCAP11, 023 (2020), arXiv:2007.08038[gr-qc doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/023
    [20] M. Li, H. Rao, and Y. Tong, arXiv: 2104.05917[gr-qc]
    [21] H. Rao, arXiv: 2107.08597[gr-qc]
    [22] M. Hohmann and C. Pfeifer, Eur. Phys. J. C81(4), 376 (2021), arXiv:2012.14423[gr-qc doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09165-x
    [23] V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B155, 36 (1985) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91028-7
    [24] M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B174, 45-47 (1986) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3
    [25] P. Langacker, R. D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Mod. Phys. Lett. A1, 541 (1986) doi:10.1142/S0217732386000683
    [26] M. A. Luty, Phys. Rev. D45, 455-465 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.455
    [27] R. N. Mohapatra and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D46, 5331-5336 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.5331
    [28] W. Buchmuller, R. D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55, 311-355 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0502169[hep-ph doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151558
    [29] M. Hohmann, Symmetry12(3), 453 (2020), arXiv:1912.12906[math-ph doi:10.3390/sym12030453
  • 加载中

Get Citation
Mingzhe Li, Yicen Mou, Haomin Rao and Dehao Zhao. Gravitational leptogenesis in teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravities[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac3411
Mingzhe Li, Yicen Mou, Haomin Rao and Dehao Zhao. Gravitational leptogenesis in teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravities[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac3411 shu
Milestone
Received: 2021-09-30
Article Metric

Article Views(4919)
PDF Downloads(42)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Email This Article

    Title:
    Email:

    Gravitational leptogenesis in teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravities

    • Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Peng Huanwu Center for Fundamental Theory, Hefei 230026, China

      Abstract:In this study, we investigate the possibilities of generating baryon number asymmetry under thermal equilibrium within the frameworks of teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravities. Through the derivative couplings of the torsion scalar and the non-metricity scalar to baryons, baryon number asymmetry is produced in the radiation dominated epoch. For gravitational baryogenesis mechanisms in these two frameworks, the produced baryon-to-entropy ratio is too small to be consistent with observations. However, the gravitational leptogenesis models within both frameworks have the potential to explain the observed baryon-antibaryon asymmetry.

        HTML

        I. INTRODUCTION
        • All current observations suggest that our universe contains an excess of matter over antimatter. The Planck result [1] showed that the left baryon-to-photon ratio is $ n_B/n_{\gamma} = (6.12\pm 0.04)\times 10^{-10} $ [2]. For theoretical discussions, it is more convenient to use the baryon-to-entropy ratio $ n_B/s $ to quantify this asymmetry, which is approximately $ n_B/s\simeq 8.7\times 10^{-11} $ as calculated from the observational result, as $ s\simeq 7.04 n_{\gamma} $ at present. The origin of this baryon number asymmetry remains unexplained in cosmology. Conventionally, it was argued that this asymmetry was generated dynamically from an initial symmetric baryon phase at the following conditions [3]: (1) baryon number non-conserving interactions, (2)CandCPviolations, (3) a departure from thermal equilibrium.

          However, if the CPT symmetry is violated, the baryon number asymmetry could be generated in thermal equilibrium [4]. For example, in Refs. [5-7], an effective interaction,

          $ {\cal{L}}_{in} = \frac{c}{M_{\ast}}\partial_{\mu}\phi J^{\mu}_B\; , $

          (1)

          between the dynamic dark energy (quintessence) and baryons was introduced, which considers a dimensionless coupling constantcand a cut-off mass scale $ M_{\ast} $ . As the universe expands, the background evolution of the scalar fieldϕbreaks the Lorentz and CPT symmetries spontaneously, providing an effective chemical potential for baryons and the opposite for antibaryons:

          $\begin{aligned}[b]& \frac{c}{M_{\ast}}\partial_{\mu}\phi J^{\mu}_B \rightarrow \frac{c}{M_{\ast}}\dot\phi \,n_B = \frac{c}{M_{\ast}}\dot\phi (n_b-n_{\bar{b}})\; ,\\& \mu_b = \frac{c}{M_{\ast}}\dot\phi = -\mu_{\bar{b}}\; . \end{aligned} $

          (2)

          This creates a difference between the distribution functions of baryons and antibaryons in thermal equilibrium, producing an excess of baryons over antibaryons [8]:

          $ n_B = \frac{g_b T^3}{6}\left[\frac{\mu_b}{T}+\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{\mu_b}{T}\right)^3\right]\simeq c\frac{\dot\phi T^2}{3M_{\ast}}\; , $

          (3)
      Baidu
      map