Chinese Physics C > 2010, Vol. 34 > Issue(6): 718-727 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/018

New results on the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g－2

Michel Davier^,

Laboratoire de l'Accélérateur Linéaire, IN2P3/CNRS, Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay 91898, France

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：

Results on the lowest-order hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon magnetic anomaly are presented. They are based on the latest published experimental data used as input to the dispersion integral. Thus recent results on τ→ν_τππ⁰decays from Belle and on e⁺e^－annihilation to π⁺π^－from BABAR and KLOE are included. The new data, together with improved isospin-breaking corrections for τ decays, result into a much better consistency among the different results. A discrepancy between the Standard Model prediction and the direct g－2 measurement is found at the level of 3σ.

[1]	Angel S. Miramontes,K. Raya,A. Bashir,P. Roig,G. Paredes-Torres. Radially excited pion: electromagnetic form factor and the box contribution to the muon'sg-2. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(8): 083108.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/add259
[2]	Ting-Ting Wang,Xiao-Ming Xu. Cross sections for inelastic 2-to-2 meson-meson scattering in hadronic matter. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(2): 024102.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/43/2/024102
[3]	Hong-Dou Jin;Li-Peng Zhou;Bing-Xin Zhang;Hai-Ming Hu. A discussion on vacuum polarization correction to the cross-section of ${e^+e^-\to\gamma^\ast/\psi\to\mu^+\mu^-}$. Chinese Physics C, 2019, df87c41e-622f-49a7-b081-5c584df157aa(11): 13104-.
[4]	Er-Tao Li,Zhi-Hong Li,Sheng-Quan Yan,Jun Su,Bing Guo,Yun-Ju Li,You-Bao Wang,Gang Lian,Sheng Zeng,Si-Zhe Chen,Shao-Bo Ma,Xiang-Qing Li,Cao He,Hui-Bin Sun,Wei-Ping Liu. Measurement of the²H(⁷Be,⁶Li)³He reaction rate and its contribution to the primordial lithium abundance. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(4): 044001.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044001
[5]	Kun Wang,Fei Wang,Jingya Zhu,Quanlin Jie. The semi-constrained NMSSM in light of muon g-2, LHC, anddark matter constraints. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 103109.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/103109
[6]	HE Yong-Zhou,ZHOU Qiao-Gen,ZHANG Ji-Dong. Sm₂Co₁₇magnet blocks for the in-vacuum undulators (IVU20) at the SSRF. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(4): 392-396.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/35/4/013
[7]	Cristina Morales,on behalf,the NA. Recent results from NA48/2. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 749-752.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/023
[8]	Tsutomu Mibe,for the,PARC g. New g－2 experiment at J-PARC. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 745-748.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/022
[9]	Gabriel López Castro. Recent progress on isospin breaking corrections and their impact on the muon g－2 value. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 712-717.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/017
[10]	M. Benayoun,L. Del Buono,B. P. David,O. Leitner. Can VMD improve the estimate of the muon g－2?. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 698-704.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/015
[11]	Lee Roberts,on behalf,of the,New Muon. Status of the Fermilab muon (g－2) experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 741-744.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/021
[12]	W. J. Marciano,A. Sirlin. Muon g－2 discrepancy: new physics or a relatively light Higgs?. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 735-740.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/020
[13]	Daisuke Nomura. Update of g－2 of the muon and Δα. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 728-734.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/019
[14]	A. Nyffeler. Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon g－2. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 705-711.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/016
[15]	PENG Wen-Xi,WANG Huan-Yu,ZHANG Cheng-Mo,CUI Xing-Zhu,CAO Xue-Lei,ZHANG Jia-Yu,LIANG Xiao-Hua,WANG Jin-Zhou,GAO Min,YANG Jia-Wei,WU Ming-Ye. Prospective results of CHANG'E-2 X-ray spectrometer. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(10): 819-825.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/33/10/001
[16]	Chen Qizhou,Fang Xiyan,Guo Shouhong. Calculation of Vacuum State for 2+1-DimensionalSU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S3): 265-272.
[17]	Yu Hong,Shen Qixing. A Study on the Polarization Structure of J/ψ →ωf₂(1270) Decay Process. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S3): 277-280.
[18]	BES Collaboration. Experimental Study of f₂(1270) in the J/ψ Hadronic Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S4): 385-393.
[19]	Wu Shishu,Yang Shande,Li Yuncai. Contribution of the 2p-1hMultiple Scattering Correlation to the Spectra of¹⁷O and¹⁵O. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(S3): 321-329.
[20]	Luo Xiangqian,Chen Qizhou,Guo Shuohong. Vacuum State of 2+1 Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory With Fermions and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(S2): 157-164.

Access

Get Citation

Michel Davier. New results on the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g－2[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 718-727. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/018

Michel Davier. New results on the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g－2[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 718-727. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/018 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2010-02-05
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(3592)
PDF Downloads(471)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

New results on the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g－2

Michel Davier^,

Corresponding author:Michel Davier,

Laboratoire de l'Accélérateur Linéaire, IN2P3/CNRS, Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay 91898, France

Received Date:2010-02-05
Accepted Date:1900-01-01
Available Online:2010-06-05

Abstract:

Results on the lowest-order hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon magnetic anomaly are presented. They are based on the latest published experimental data used as input to the dispersion integral. Thus recent results on τ→ν_τππ⁰decays from Belle and on e⁺e^－annihilation to π⁺π^－from BABAR and KLOE are included. The new data, together with improved isospin-breaking corrections for τ decays, result into a much better consistency among the different results. A discrepancy between the Standard Model prediction and the direct g－2 measurement is found at the level of 3σ.