\begin{document}$\gamma $\end{document}) 91Ru reaction at a beam energy of 111 MeV. Charged particles, neutrons, and \begin{document}$\gamma $\end{document}-rays were emitted in this reaction and detected by the DIAMANT CsI ball, Neutron Wall, and the EXOGAM Ge clover array, respectively. In addition to the previously reported levels in 91Ru, new low-to-medium spin states were observed. Angular correlation and linear polarization measurements were performed to unambiguously determine spins and parities of the excited states in 91Ru. The low-spin states of 91Ru exhibit a scheme of multi-quasiparticle excitations, which is very similar to that of the neighboring \begin{document}$N=47$\end{document} isotone. These excitations have been interpreted in terms of the shell model. The calculations performed in the configuration space \begin{document}$(p_{3/2},f_{5/2},p_{1/2},g_{9/2})$\end{document} reproduce the experimental excitation energies reasonably well, supporting the interpretation of the newly assigned positive-parity states in terms of the three quasiparticle configurations \begin{document}$\pi(g_{9/2})^{-2} \nu(g_{9/2})^{-1}$\end{document} and \begin{document}$\nu (g_{9/2})^{-3}$\end{document}."> Multi-quasiparticle excitations of <sup>91</sup>Ru -
  • [1]

    S. E. Arnell, S. Sjöberg, Ö. Skeppstedt et al, Nucl. Phys. A,280: 72 (1977)

  • [2]

    L. Lühmann, K. P. Lieb, A. Moussavi-Zarandi et al, Z. Phys. A,313: 297 (1983)

  • [3]

    M. Weiszflog, D. Rudolph, C. J. Gross et al, Z. Phys. A,344: 395 (1993)

  • [4]

    M. Weiszflog, A. Jungclaus, D. Kast et al, Z. Phys. A,353: 7 (1995)

  • [5]

    A. L. Goodman , Adv. Nucl. Phys.,11: 263 (1979)

  • [6]

    J. E. Kitching, P. A. Batay-Csorba, C. A. Fields et al, Nucl. Phys. A,302: 159 (1978)

  • [7]

    S. E. Arnell, D. Foltescu, H. A. Roth et al, Phys. Scr.,47: 355 (1993)

  • [8]

    J. Heese, H. Grawe, K. H. Maier et al, Phys. Rev C,49: 1896 (1994)

  • [9]

    S. Dean, M. Górska, F. Aksouh et al, Eur. Phys. J. A,21: 243 (2004)

  • [10]

    M. Górska, S. Dean, V. Prasad et al, Proceedings of the International Workshop “Selected Topics on N=Z nuclei”, Eds. Rudolph D and Hellström M. Lund, Sweden, 2000. 46

  • [11]

    Y. Zheng, G. France, E. Clément et al, Phys. Rev. C,87: 044328 (2013)

  • [12]

    J. N. Scheurer, M. Aiche, M. M. Aleonard et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A,385: 501 (1997)

  • [13]

    J. Gál, G. Hegyesi, J. Molnár et al , Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A,516: 502 (2004)

  • [14]

    Ö. Skeppstedt, H. A. Roth, L. Lindström et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A,421: 531 (1999)

  • [15]

    J. Simpson, F. Azaiez, G. France et al, Acta Physica Hungarica, New Series, Heavy Ion Physics,11: 159 (2000)

  • [16]

    K. S. Krane, R. M. Steffen, and R. M. Wheeler, Nucl. Data Tables,11: 351 (1973)

  • [17]

    B. Schlitt, U. Maier, H. Friedrichs et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A,337: 416 (1994)

  • [18]

    B. Cederwall, F. Ghazi Moradi, T. Back et al, Nature,469: 68 (2011)

  • [19]

    M. Hasegawa and K. Kaneko , Phys. Rev. C,59: 1449 (1999)

  • [20]

    M. Hasegawa, K. Kaneko, and S. Tazaki, Nucl. Phys. A,674: 411 (2000)

  • [21]

    M. Hasegawa, K. Kaneko, T. Mizusaki et al, Nucl. Phys. A,688: 765 (2001)

  • [22]

    M. Hasegawa, K. Kaneko, and S. Tazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys.,107: 731 (2002)

  • [23]

    M. Hasegawa, K. Kaneko, T. Mizusaki et al, Phys. Rev. C,69: 034324 (2004)

  • [24]

    W. Rae, the article and the NuShellX code on the Web Sitehttp://knollhouse.org., released in 2008

Baidu
map