\begin{document}$ \sigma_r $\end{document}. This is equated to the sum of the cross-sections due to absorption in different regions of the potential where the imaginary part is actively present. The potential is taken as energy independent and features a weakly absorbing nature, which supports the resonance states in various partial wave trajectories. Therefore, these resonances show oscillatory behavior changes with respect to energy \begin{document}$D(E_{{\rm c.m.}})=\dfrac{{\rm d}^{2}(E_{{\rm c.m.}}\sigma_{{\rm fus}})}{{\rm d}E_{{\rm c.m.}}^{2}}$\end{document}. In this paper, we discuss elastic scattering and fusion cross-sections in conjunction with the results of \begin{document}$D(E_{{\rm c.m.}})$\end{document} for the \begin{document}$\rm ^{16}O+^{92}Zr$\end{document} system."> Scattering and fusion reaction dynamics of O + Zr system around Coulomb barrier -
  • [1]

    K. Vo-Phuoc, C. Simenel, and E. C. Simpson, Phys. Rev. C94, 024612 (2016)

  • [2]

    H. Esbensen and S. Misicu, Phys. Rev. C76, 054609 (2007)

  • [3]

    B. Sahuet al., Phys. Rev. C77, 024604 (2008)

  • [4]

    B. B. Sahu, R. K. Paira, and B. Sahu, Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys.59, 610 (2014)

  • [5]

    Bidhubhusan Sahu, and Basudeb Sahu., DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys.54, 290 (2009)

  • [6]

    J. O. Newton, C. R. Morton, M. Dasguptaet al., Phys. Rev. C64, 064608 (2001)

  • [7]

    Y. Eisen and Z. Vager, Nucl. Phys. A187, 219 (1972)

  • [8]

    T. Udagawa, B. T. Kim, and T. Tamura, Phys. Rev. C32, 124 (1985)

  • [9]

    G. E. Moore, K. W. Kemper, and L. A. Charlton, Phys. Rev.C11, 1099 (1975)

  • [10]

    P. E. Hodgson,The Optical Model of Elastic Scattering, (Clarendon, Oxford, 1963)

  • [11]

    A. J. Koning and J. P. Delaroche, Nucl. Phys. A713, 231 (2003)

  • [12]

    Y. Xu, Y. Han, J. Huet al., Phys. Rev. C98, 024619 (2018)

  • [13]

    W. M. Seif, Nucl. Phys. A767, 92 (2006)

  • [14]

    F. Gollan, D. Abriola, A. Araziet al., Nucl. Phys. A1000, 121789 (2020)

  • [15]

    C. L. Jianget al., Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 012701 (2004)

  • [16]

    J. G. Kelleret al., Nucl. Phys. A152, 173 (1986)

  • [17]

    J. R. Leighet al., Phys. Rev. C52, 3151 (1995)

  • [18]

    F. Torabiet al., Phys. Rev. C95, 034601 (2017)

  • [19]

    R. H. Landau and M. J. P. Mejia A,Computational Physics Problem Solving with Computers, (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1997)

  • [20]

    F. R. Loscalzo and T. D. Talbot, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.73, 438 (1967)

  • [21]

    G. Micula, Math. Comp.27, 807 (1973)

  • [22]

    B. Sahu, B. B. Sahu, and S. K. Agarwalla, Pram. J. Phys.70, 27 (2008)

  • [23]

    M. A. Melkanoff, T. Sawada, and J. Raynal,Methods in Computational Physics, Vol. VI, Nuclear Optical Model Calculations(Academic Press, New York, 1966).

  • [24]

    C. S. Shastry and Y. K. Gambhir, Phys. Rev. C28, 1109 (1983)

  • [25]

    M. P. Nicoliet al., Phys. Rev. C60, 064608 (1999)

  • [26]

    S. C. Pieper, M. J. Rhoades-Brown, and S. Landowne, Phys. Lett. B162, 43 (1985)

  • [27]

    M. A. G. Alvarez, Nucl. Phys. A656, 187 (1999)

  • [28]

    E. M. Takagui, Nucl. Phys. A514, 120 (1990)

  • [29]

    Lin Ganet al., Chin. Phys. C45, 054105 (2021)

Baidu
map