\begin{document}$ H\rightarrow Z \nu_l\bar{\nu}_l $\end{document} (for \begin{document}$ l = e, \mu, \tau $\end{document}). The calculations are performed within the Standard Model framework in the 't Hooft-Veltman gauge. One-loop form factors are then written in terms of scalar one-loop functions in the standard notations of \begin{document}$ {\tt LoopTools}$\end{document}. As a result, one-loop decay rates for the decay channels can be evaluated numerically by using the package. Furthermore, we analyze the signals of \begin{document}$ H\rightarrow Z \nu_l\bar{\nu}_l $\end{document} via the production processes \begin{document}$ e^-e^+ \rightarrow ZH^* \rightarrow Z (H^* \rightarrow Z \nu_l\bar{\nu}_l) $\end{document}, including the initial beam polarizations at future lepton colliders. The Standard Model backgrounds, such as the processes \begin{document}$ e^-e^+ \rightarrow \nu_l\bar{\nu}_l ZZ $\end{document}, are also examined in this study. Numerical results indicate that one-loop corrections make contributions of approximately 10% to the decay rates. These are sizeable contributions and should be taken into account at future colliders. We show that the signals \begin{document}$ H\rightarrow Z\nu_l\bar{\nu}_l $\end{document} are clearly visible at the center-of-mass energy \begin{document}$ \sqrt{s}=250 $\end{document} GeV and are difficult to probe in higher-energy regions owing to the dominant backgrounds."> One-loop formulas for <i>H</i> → <i>Zν</i><sub><i>l</i></sub><span style="text-decoration:overline"><i>ν</i></span><sub><i>l</i></sub> for <i>l</i> = <i>e</i>, <i>µ</i>, <i>τ</i> in 't Hooft-Veltman gauge -
  • [1]

    G. Aadet al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B716, 1-29 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214[hep-ex

  • [2]

    S. Chatrchyanet al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B716, 30-61 (2012), arXiv:1207.7235[hep-ex

  • [3]

    A. Lisset al.(ATLAS), arXiv:1307.7292 [hep-ex]

  • [4]

    (CMS), arXiv:1307.7135 [hep-ex]

  • [5]

    H. Baer, T. Barklow, K. Fujiiet al.arXiv:1306.6352 [hep-ph]

  • [6]

    G. Aadet al. (ATLAS), JHEP08, 104 (2022), arXiv:2202.07953[hep-ex

  • [7]

    Z. Q. Chen, Q. M. Feng, and C. F. Qiao, arXiv:2107.04858[hep-ph]

  • [8]

    B. A. Kniehl and O. L. Veretin, Phys. Rev. D86, 053007 (2012), arXiv:1206.7110[hep-ph

  • [9]

    A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaieret al., Phys. Rev. D74, 013004 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604011[hep-ph

  • [10]

    A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaieret al., JHEP02, 080 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611234[hep-ph

  • [11]

    K. H. Phan, L. Hue, and D. T. Tran, PTEP2021(9), 093B05 (2021), arXiv:2103.14248[hep-ph

  • [12]

    H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun.197, 276-290 (2015)

  • [13]

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Nucl. Phys. B734, 62-115 (2006)

  • [14]

    A. Denner, Fortsch. Phys.41, 307-420 (1993), arXiv:0709.1075[hep-ph

  • [15]

    T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun.118, 153-165 (1999)

  • [16]

    K. H. Phan and D. T. Tran, arXiv:2209.12410 [hep-ph]

  • [17]

    A. Kachanovich, U. Nierste, and I. Nišandžić, Phys. Rev. D105(1), 013007 (2022), arXiv:2109.04426[hep-ph

  • [18]

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, J. Fujimotoet al., Phys. Rept.430, 117-209 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0308080[hep-ph

  • [19]

    N. M. U. Quach, J. Fujimoto, and Y. Kurihara, PTEP2022(7), 073C01 (2022), arXiv:2204.08473[hep-ph

Baidu
map