\begin{document}$ B_{c,u,d}\to X(3872)P $\end{document} decays in the perturbative QCD (PQCD) approach, involving the puzzling resonance \begin{document}$ X(3872) $\end{document}, where P represents a light pseudoscalar meson (K or π). Assuming \begin{document}$ X(3872) $\end{document} to be a \begin{document}$ 1^{++} $\end{document} charmonium state, we obtain the following results. (a) The branching ratios of the \begin{document}$ B^+_c\to X(3872)\pi^+ $\end{document} and \begin{document}$ B^+_c\to X(3872) K^+ $\end{document} decays are consistent with the results predicted by the covariant light-front approach within errors; however, they are larger than those given by the generalized factorization approach. (b) The branching ratio of the \begin{document}$ B^+\to X(3872)K^+ $\end{document} decay is predicted as \begin{document}$ (3.8^{+1.1}_{-1.0})\times10^{-4} $\end{document}, which is smaller than the previous PQCD calculation result but still slightly larger than the upper limits set by Belle and BaBar. Hence, we suggest that the\begin{document}$ B^{0,+}\to X(3872)K^{0,+} $\end{document} decays should be precisely measured by the LHCb and Belle II experiments to help probe the inner structure of \begin{document}$ X(3872) $\end{document}. (c) Compared with the \begin{document}$ B_{u,d}\to X(3872)K $\end{document}decays, the \begin{document}$ B_{u,d}\to X(3872)\pi $\end{document} decays have significantly smaller branching ratios, which drop to values as low as \begin{document}$ 10^{-6} $\end{document}. (d) The direct CP violations of these considered decays are small (\begin{document}$ 10^{-3}\sim 10^{-2} $\end{document}) because the penguin contributions are loop suppressed compared to the tree contributions. The mixing-induced CP violation of the \begin{document}$ B\to X(3872)K^0_S $\end{document} decay is highly consistent with the current world average value \begin{document}$ \sin2\beta=(69.9\pm1.7)$\end{document}%. Experimentally testing the results for the branching ratios and CP violations, including the implicit \begin{document}$S U(3)$\end{document} and isospin symmetries of these decays, helps probe the nature of \begin{document}$ X(3872) $\end{document}."> Insights into the nature of <i>X</i>(3872) through <i>B</i> meson decays -
  • [1]

    S. K. Choiet al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003)

  • [2]

    D. Acostaet al. (CDF Ⅱ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 072001 (2004)

  • [3]

    V. M. Abazovet al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 162002 (2004)

  • [4]

    B. Aubertet al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D71, 071103 (2005)

  • [5]

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D102, 092005 (2020)

  • [6]

    F. E. Close and P. R. Rage, Phys. Lett. B578, 119 (2004)

  • [7]

    C. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. C69, 055202 (2004)

  • [8]

    E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Phys. Rev. D69, 074005 (2004)

  • [9]

    E. S. Swanson, Phys. Lett. B588, 189 (2004)

  • [10]

    Z. Y. Lin, J. B. Cheng, and S. L. Zhu, arXiv: 2205.03572

  • [11]

    H. Chen, W. Q. Niu, and H. Q. Zheng, arXiv:2205.14628

  • [12]

    T. W. Chiuet al. (TWQCD Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B646, 95 (2007)

  • [13]

    N. Barnea, J. Vijande, and A. Valcarce, Phys. Rev. D73, 054004 (2006)

  • [14]

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosaet al., Phys. Rev. D71, 014028 (2005)

  • [15]

    H. Hogaasen, J. M. Richard, and P. Sorba, Phys. Rev. D73, 054013 (2006)

  • [16]

    F. E. Close and S. Godfrey, Phys. Lett. B574, 210 (2003)

  • [17]

    B. A. Li, Phys. Lett. B605, 306 (2005)

  • [18]

    K. K. Seth, Phys. Lett. B612, 1 (2005)

  • [19]

    T. Barnes and S. Godfrey, Phys. Rev. D69, 054008 (2004)

  • [20]

    E. J. Eichten, K. Lane, and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D69, 094019 (2004)

  • [21]

    C. Quigg, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.142, 87 (2005)

  • [22]

    P. A. Zylaet al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2020, 083C01 (2020)

  • [23]

    H. X. Chen, Commun. Theor. Phys.74, 025201 (2022)

  • [24]

    L. Meng, G. J. Wang, B. Wanget al., Phys. Rev. D104, 094003 (2021)

  • [25]

    Q. Wu, D. Y. Chen, and T. Matsuki, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 193 (2021)

  • [26]

    R. D. Matheus, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsenet al., Phys. Rev. D80, 056002 (2009)

  • [27]

    C. Meng, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, M. Shiet al., Phys. Rev. D92, 034020 (2015)

  • [28]

    C. Meng, Y. J. Gao, and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D87, 074035 (2013)

  • [29]

    W. Wang, Y. L. Shen, and C. D. Lu, Eur. Phys. J. C51, 841 (2007)

  • [30]

    Y. K. Hsiao and C. Q. Geng, Chin. Phys. C41, 013101 (2017)

  • [31]

    E. Braaten, M. Kusunoki, and S. Nussinov, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 162001 (2004)

  • [32]

    E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Phys. Rev. D71, 074005 (2005)

  • [33]

    X. Liu and Y. M. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C49, 643 (2007)

  • [34]

    Y. Katoet al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D97, 012005 (2018)

  • [35]

    B. Aubertet al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett96, 052002 (2006)

  • [36]

    C. H. Chen and H. n. Li, Phys. Rev. D71, 114008 (2005)

  • [37]

    Y. Li, C. D. Lu, and C. F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D73, 094006 (2006)

  • [38]

    Z. Rui and Z. T. Zou, Phys. Rev. D90, 114030 (2014)

  • [39]

    Z. Q. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B772, 719 (2017)

  • [40]

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 1125 (1996)

  • [41]

    Z. Q. Zhang, S. Y. Wang, and X. K. Ma, Phys. Rev. D93, 054034 (2016)

  • [42]

    X. Liu, Z. J. Xiao, and C. D. Lu, Phys. Rev. D81, 014022 (2010)

  • [43]

    R. Zhou, Q. Zhao, and L. L. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 463 (2018)

  • [44]

    Y. S. Amhiset al., Eur. Phys. J. C81, 226 (2021) and the online update athttps://hflav.web.cern.ch/

Baidu
map