\begin{document}$ e^+e^- \rightarrow ZH $\end{document} process is the dominant process for the Higgs boson production at the future Higgs factory. In order to match the analysis on the Higgs properties with highly precise experiment data, it will be crucial to include the theoretical prediction to the full next-to-next-to-leading order electroweak effect in the production rate \begin{document}$ \sigma(e^+e^-\rightarrow ZH) $\end{document}. In this inspiring work, we categorize the two-loop Feynman diagrams of the \begin{document}$ {\cal O}(\alpha^2) $\end{document} correction to \begin{document}$ e^+e^- \rightarrow ZH $\end{document} into 6 categories according to relevant topological structures. Although 25377 diagrams contribute to the \begin{document}$ {\cal O}(\alpha^2) $\end{document} correction in total, the number of the most challenging diagrams with seven denominators is 2250, which contain only 312 non-planar diagrams with 155 independent types. This categorization could be a valuable reference for the complete calculation in future."> Categorization of two-loop Feynman diagrams in the <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ {{\cal O}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{(\alpha^2)}}}} $\end{document}</tex-math><alternatives><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="//www.macurncorp.com/cpc/article/app/id/5be63560-3098-421d-9d9f-9f062bcd566a/CPC-2020-0676_M1.jpg"/><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="//www.macurncorp.com/cpc/article/app/id/5be63560-3098-421d-9d9f-9f062bcd566a/CPC-2020-0676_M1.png"/></alternatives></inline-formula> correction to <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{e^+}}}{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{e^-}}}} {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\rightarrow ZH}}}} $\end{document}</tex-math><alternatives><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="//www.macurncorp.com/cpc/article/app/id/5be63560-3098-421d-9d9f-9f062bcd566a/CPC-2020-0676_M2.jpg"/><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="//www.macurncorp.com/cpc/article/app/id/5be63560-3098-421d-9d9f-9f062bcd566a/CPC-2020-0676_M2.png"/></alternatives></inline-formula> -
  • [1]

    G. Aadet al., Phys. Lett. B716, 1-29 (2012

  • [2]

    S. Chatrchyanet al., Phys. Lett. B716, 30-61 (2012

  • [3]

    The CEPC Study Group, CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector, arXiv: 1811.10545

  • [4]

    The CEPC Study Group, CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1 - Accelerator, arXiv: 1809.00285

  • [5]

    H. Baeret al., arXiv: 1306.6352

  • [6]

    T. Behnkeet al., arXiv: 1306.6327

  • [7]

    P. Bambadeet al., arXiv: 1903.01629

  • [8]

    M. Biceret al., JHEP01, 164 (2014

  • [9]

    A. Abadaet al., Eur. Phys. ST J.228(2), 261 (2019

  • [10]

    A. Abadaet al., Eur. Phys. J. C79(6), 474 (2019

  • [11]

    B. Ioffe and V. A. Khoze, Sov. J. Part. Nucl.9, 50 (1978

  • [12]

    M. McCullough, Phys. Rev. D,90(1): 015001 (2014), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D92, 039903 (2015)]

  • [13]

    J. Yan, S. Watanuki, K. Fujiiet al., Phys. Rev. D94(11), 113002 (2016

  • [14]

    F. Anet al., Chin. Phys. C43(4), 043002 (2019

  • [15]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Projections for measurements of Higgs boson signal strengths and coupling parameters with the ATLAS detector at a HL-LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-016 (2014),http://cds.cern.ch/record/1956710

  • [16]

    Projected performance of an upgraded cms detector at the lhc and hl-lhc: Contribution to the snowmass process, in Community Summer Study 2013, : Snowmass on the Mississippi, arXiv: 1307.7135

  • [17]

    N. Craig, M. Farina, M. McCulloughet al., JHEP03, 146 (2015

  • [18]

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, Phys. Rept.496, 1-77 (2010

  • [19]

    J. Fan, M. Reece, and L.-T. Wang, JHEP08, 152 (2015

  • [20]

    R. Essig, P. Meade, H. Ramaniet al., JHEP09, 085 (2017

  • [21]

    J. Choi and R. Volkas, Phys. Lett. B317, 385-391 (1993

  • [22]

    J. McDonald, Phys. Lett. B323, 339-346 (1994

  • [23]

    S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and G. Shaughnessy, JHEP08, 010 (2007

  • [24]

    P. Huang, A. J. Long, and L.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D94(7), 075008 (2016

  • [25]

    J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner, Nucl. Phys. B216, 469-492 (1983

  • [26]

    B. A. Kniehl, Z. Phys. C55, 605-618 (1992

  • [27]

    A. Denner, J. Kublbeck, R. Mertiget al., Z. Phys. C56, 261-272 (1992

  • [28]

    Y. Gong, Z. Li, X. Xuet al., Phys. Rev. D95(9), 093003 (2017

  • [29]

    Q.-F. Sun, F. Feng, Y. Jiaet al., Phys. Rev. D96(5), 051301 (2017

  • [30]

    W. Chen, F. Feng, Y. Jiaet al., Chin. Phys. C43(1), 013108 (2019

  • [31]

    A. Freitaset al., arXiv: 1906.05379

  • [32]

    Q. Song and A. Freitas, arXiv: 2101.00308

  • [33]

    P. Nogueira, J. Comput. Phys.105, 279-289 (1993

  • [34]

    T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun.140, 418-431 (2001

  • [35]

    D. Batkovich, Y. Kirienko, M. Kompanietset al., arXiv: 1409.8227

  • [36]

    B. Nickel, D. Meiron, and G. B. Jr., Compilation of 2-pt and 4-pt graphs for continuous spin model, University of Guelph report

  • [37]

    J. F. Nagle, J.Math.Phys.7, 1588-1592 (1966

  • [38]

    A. I. Davydychev and J. Tausk, Nucl. Phys. B397, 123-142 (1993

Baidu
map