\begin{document}$ ^{10}\mathrm{Be} $\end{document} for all targets at energies around and above the barrier. Indeed, neutron capture becomes increasingly important as the target becomes heavier. In addition, it is found that incomplete fusion becomes larger than complete fusion for energies lower than a certain value that depends on the target. Above this value, complete fusion overcomes incomplete fusion. As a final calculation, an energy-dependent systematic comparison of the total incomplete fusion, incomplete fusion of the neutron, and incomplete fusion of 10Be for the different targets is presented. The calculations are performed with two complementary theoretical approaches. The continuum discretized coupled channel model is used to determine the relative projectile-target radial wave functions, which are subsequently used in the angular-momentum-dependent model of fusion probabilities to calculate complete, incomplete, and total fusion cross sections."> Calculations of fusion capture of breakup fragments of the weakly bound projectile <sup>11</sup>Be with several targets -
  • [1]

    L. F. Canto, P. R. S. Gomes, R. Donangeloet al., Phys. Rep.424, 1 (2006)

  • [2]

    N. Keeley, R. Raabe, N. Alamanoset al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.59, 579 (2007)

  • [3]

    K. Hagino and N. Takigawa, Prog. Theor. Phys.128, 1061 (2012)

  • [4]

    B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C. L. Jianget al., Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 317 (2014)

  • [5]

    L. F. Canto, P. R. S. Gomes, R. Donangeloet al., Phys. Rep.596, 1 (2015)

  • [6]

    Jin Lei and Antonio M. Moro, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 042503 (2019)

  • [7]

    D. H. Luong,et al., Phys. Lett. B695, 105 (2011)

  • [8]

    D. H. Luong, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde,et al., Phys. Rev. C88, 034609 (2013)

  • [9]

    R. Rafiei, R. du Rietz, D. H. Luonget al., Phys. Rev. C81, 024601 (2010)

  • [10]

    A. Shrivastava,et al., Phys. Lett. B633, 463 (2006)

  • [11]

    Y. Sakuragi, M. Yahiro, M. Kamimura, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.89, 1 (1986)

  • [12]

    Y. Sakuragi, M. Yahiro, M. Kamimura, Prog. Theor. Phys.70, 1047 (1983)

  • [13]

    N. Austern, Y. Iseri, M. Kamimura,et al., Phys. Rep.154, 125 (1987)

  • [14]

    A. Diaz-Torres, I.J. Thompson, C. Beck, Phys. Rev. C68, 044607 (2003)

  • [15]

    V. V. Parkar, V. Jha, S. Kailas, Phys. Rev. C94, 024609 (2016)

  • [16]

    V. V. Parkar, S. K. Pandit, A. Shrivastavaet al., Phys. Rev. C98, 014601 (2018)

  • [17]

    H. Kumawat, V. Jha, V. V. Parkaret al., Phys. Rev C86, 024607 (2012)

  • [18]

    J. Rangel, M.R. Cortes, J. Lubian, L.F. Canto, Phys. Lett B803, 135337 (2020)

  • [19]

    M.R. Cortes, J. Rangel, J.L. Ferreiraet al., Phys. Rev. C102, 064628 (2020)

  • [20]

    J. Lubian, J. Ferreira, J. Rangelet al., Phys. Rev. C105, 054601 (2022)

  • [21]

    A. G. Camacho, J. Rangel, J. Lubian, Phys. Rev. C111, 014604 (2025)

  • [22]

    G. R. Satchler, M. A. Nagarajan, J. S. Lileyet al., Ann. Phys. (NY)178, 110 (1987)

  • [23]

    G. Potel, F. M. Nunes, I. J. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C92, 034611 (2015)

  • [24]

    I. J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep.167, 167 (1988)

  • [25]

    P. Capel, G. Goldstein, D. Baye, Phys. Rev. C70, 064605 (2004)

  • [26]

    J. L. Ferreira, J. Rangel, J. Lubianet al., Phys. Rev. C107, 034603 (2023)

  • [27]

    L.F. Canto, J. Rangel, J. Lubian, CF-ICF computer code (unpublished).

  • [28]

    L.F. Canto, R. Donangelo, M. S. H. Husseinet al., Phys. Rev. C98, 044617 (2018)

  • [29]

    L. C. Chamon, D. Pereira, M. S. Husseinet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 5218 (1997)

  • [30]

    L. C. Chamon, B. V. Carlson, L. R. Gasqueset al., Phys. Rev. C66, 014610 (2002)

Baidu
map