\begin{document}${^{6, 7}{\rm{Li}}}$\end{document} with \begin{document}${^{209}{\rm{Bi}}}$\end{document} at energies around and above the Coulomb barrier were carried out using a large solid-angle covered detector array. Through the Q values along with the relative energies of the breakup fragments, different breakup components (prompt breakups and delayed breakups) and different breakup modes (\begin{document}$\alpha + t$\end{document}, \begin{document}$\alpha + d$\end{document}, \begin{document}$\alpha + p$\end{document}, and \begin{document}$\alpha + \alpha$\end{document}) are distinguished. A new breakup mode, \begin{document}$\alpha + t$\end{document}, is observed in \begin{document}${^{6}{\rm{Li}}}$\end{document}-induced reactions at energies above the Coulomb barrier. Correlations between breakup modes and breakup components as well as their variations with the incident energy are investigated. The results will help us better understand the breakup effects of weakly bound nuclei on the suppression of a complete fusion, particularly for the above-barrier energies."> Relative probabilities of breakup channels in reactions of <sup>6,7</sup>Li with <sup>209</sup>Bi at energies around and above the Coulomb barrier -
  • [1]

    C. Signorini, A. Edifizi, M. Mazzoccoet al., Phys. Rev. C67, 044607 (2003

  • [2]

    K. J. Cook, E. C. Simpson, L. T. Bezzinaet al., Phys. Rev. Lett122, 102501 (2019

  • [3]

    M. Dasgupta, P. R. S. Gomes, D. J. Hindeet al., Phys. Rev. C70, 024606 (2004

  • [4]

    M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, R. D. Buttet al., Phys. Rev. Lett82, 1395 (1999

  • [5]

    P. K. Rath, S. Santra, N. L. Singhet al., Phys. Rev. C79, 051601 (2009

  • [6]

    V. V. Parkar, R. Palit, Sushil K. Sharmaet al., Phys. Rev. C82, 054601 (2010

  • [7]

    N. T. Zhang, Y. D. Fang, P. R. S. Gomeset al., Phys. Rev. C90, 024621 (2014

  • [8]

    Y. D. Fang, P. R. S. Gomes, J. Lubianet al., Phys. Rev. C91, 014608 (2015

  • [9]

    V. V. Parkar, Sushil K. Sharma, R. Palitet al., Phys. Rev. C97, 014607 (2018

  • [10]

    K. J. Cook, E. C. Simpson, D. H. Luonget al., Phys. Rev. C93, 064604 (2016

  • [11]

    D. J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, B. R. Fultonet al., Phys. Rev. Lett89, 272701 (2002

  • [12]

    D. H. Luong, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hindeet al., Phys. Let. B695, 105-109 (2011

  • [13]

    D. H. Luong, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hindeet al., Phys. Rev. C88, 034609 (2013

  • [14]

    E. C. Simpson, K. J. Cook, D. H. Luonget al., Phys. Rev. C93, 024605 (2016

  • [15]

    Sunil Kalkal, E. C. Simpson, D. H. Luonget al., Phys. Rev. C93, 069904 (2016

  • [16]

    Alexis Diaz-Torres, Comput. Phys. Commun182, 1100 (2011

  • [17]

    M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, K. Haginoet al., Phys. Rev. C66, 041602 (2002

  • [18]

    Yong-Jin Yao, Cheng-Jian Lin, Lei Yanget al., Nucl. Sci. Tech.32, 14 (2021)

  • [19]

    Dong-Xi Wang, Cheng-Jian Lin, Lei Yanget al., Nucl. Sci. Tech.31, 48 (2020

  • [20]

    Jin Lei and Antonio M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C92, 061602 (2015

  • [21]

    Jin Lei and Antonio M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C95, 044605 (2017

  • [22]

    S. Santra, S. Kailas, V. V. Parkaret al., Phys. Rev. C85, 014612 (2012

  • [23]

    O. B. Tarasovab and D. Bazina, Nucl. Phys. A746, 411-414 (2004

  • [24]

    R. Rafiei, R. du Rietz, D. H. Luonget al., Phys. Rev. C81, 024601 (2010

Baidu
map